R&D competition versus R&D cooperation in oligopolistic markets with evolving structure

被引:29
作者
Dawid, H. [1 ,2 ]
Kopel, M. [3 ,4 ]
Kort, P. M. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bielefeld, Dept Business Adm & Econ, Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Univ Bielefeld, Ctr Math Econ, Bielefeld, Germany
[3] Graz Univ, Dept Org, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[4] Graz Univ, Inst Econ, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[5] Tilburg Univ, Dept Econometr & Operat Res, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[6] Tilburg Univ, CentER, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[7] Univ Antwerp, Dept Econ, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
R&D; Competition; Cooperation; Product innovation; Capital accumulation; Differential game; CAPACITY INVESTMENT; SPILLOVERS; COLLABORATION; PATTERNS; DUOPOLY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.09.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper considers investment behavior of duopolistic firms subject to technological progress. It is assumed that initially both firms offer a homogeneous product, but after a stochastic waiting time they are able to implement a product innovation. Production capacities of both firms are product specific. It is shown that firms anticipate a future product innovation by under-investing (if the new product is a substitute to the established product) and higher profits, and over-investing (in case of complements) and lower profits, compared to the corresponding standard capital accumulation game. This anticipation effect is stronger in the case of R&D cooperation. Furthermore, since due to R&D cooperation firms introduce the new product at the same time, this leads to intensified competition and lower firm profits right after the new product has been introduced. In addition, we show that under R&D competition the firm that innovates first, overshoots in new-product capacity buildup in order to exploit its temporary monopoly position. Taking into account all these effects, the result is that, if the new product is neither a close substitute nor a strong complement of the established product, positive synergy effects in R&D cooperation are necessary to make it more profitable for firms than R&D competition. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 537
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIFFERENTIAL GAMES E
[2]   Capacity dynamics and endogenous asymmetries in firm size [J].
Besanko, D ;
Doraszelski, U .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 35 (01) :23-49
[3]   Lumpy Capacity Investment and Disinvestment Dynamics [J].
Besanko, David ;
Doraszelski, Ulrich ;
Lu, Lauren Xiaoyuan ;
Satterthwaite, Mark .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (04) :1178-1193
[4]   On the role of demand and strategic uncertainty in capacity investment and disinvestment dynamics [J].
Besanko, David ;
Doraszelski, Ulrich ;
Lu, Lauren Xiaoyuan ;
Satterthwaite, Mark .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2010, 28 (04) :383-389
[5]   Cooperation in product development and process R&D between competitors [J].
Bourreau, Marc ;
Dogan, Pinar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2010, 28 (02) :176-190
[6]   Oligopoly Dynamics [J].
Cabral, Luis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2012, 30 (03) :278-282
[7]   A differential game approach to investment in product differentiation [J].
Cellini, R ;
Lambertini, L .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2002, 27 (01) :51-62
[8]   Dynamic R&D with spillovers: Competition vs cooperation [J].
Cellini, Roberto ;
Lambertini, Luca .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2009, 33 (03) :568-582
[9]   COOPERATIVE R-AND-D WITH PRODUCT MARKET COMPETITION [J].
CHOI, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1993, 11 (04) :553-571
[10]  
DASPREMONT C, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P1133