Experimental validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code using minimally scattered electron beams in heterogeneous media

被引:18
作者
Chetty, IJ [1 ]
Moran, JM
Nurushev, TS
McShan, DL
Fraass, BA
Wilderman, SJ
Bielajew, AF
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Nucl Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/47/11/301
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A comprehensive set of measurements and calculations has been conducted to investigate the accuracy of the Dose Planning Method (DPM) Monte Carlo code for electron beam dose calculations in heterogeneous media. Measurements were made using 10 MeV and 50 MeV minimally scattered, uncollimated electron beams from a racetrack microtron. Source distributions for the Monte Carlo calculations were reconstructed from in-air ion chamber scans and then benchmarked against measurements in a homogeneous water phantom. The in-air spatial distributions were found to have FWHM of 4.7 cm and 1.3 cm, at 100 cm from the source, for the 10 MeV and 50 MeV beams respectively. Energy spectra for the electron beams were determined by simulating the components of the microtron treatment head using the code MCNP4B. Profile measurements were made using an ion chamber in a water phantom with slabs of lung or bone-equivalent materials Submerged at various depths. DPM calculations are, on average, within 2% agreement with measurement for all geometries except for the 50 MeV incident on a 6 cm lung-equivalent slab. Measurements using approximately monoenergetic, 50 MeV, 'pencil-beam'-type electrons in heterogeneous media provide conditions for maximum electronic disequilibrium and hence present a stringent test of the code's electron transport physics; the agreement noted between calculation and measurement illustrates that the DPM code is capable of accurate dose calculation even under such conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1837 / 1851
页数:15
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Berger M.J., 1993, 4999 NISTIR
[2]   ELECTRON AND PHOTON BEAMS FROM A 50 MEV RACETRACK MICROTRON [J].
BRAHME, A ;
KRAEPELIEN, T ;
SVENSSON, H .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA ONCOLOGY, 1980, 19 (04) :305-319
[3]  
BRIESMEISTER JF, 2000, LA12625M LOS AL NAT
[4]  
CHETTY IJ, 2002, IN PRESS MED PHYS, V29
[5]   CT-based Monte Carlo simulation tool for dosimetry planning and analysis [J].
DeMarco, JJ ;
Solberg, TD ;
Smathers, JB .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (01) :1-11
[6]   A multiple source model for 6 MV photon beam dose calculations using Monte Carlo [J].
Fix, MK ;
Stampanoni, M ;
Manser, P ;
Born, EJ ;
Mini, R ;
Rüegsegger, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (05) :1407-1427
[7]   Calculation of absorbed dose and biological effectiveness from photonuclear reactions in a bremsstrahlung beam of end point 50 MeV [J].
Gudowska, I ;
Brahme, A ;
Andreo, P ;
Gudowski, W ;
Kierkegaard, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (09) :2099-2125
[8]   ELECTRON-BEAM CHARACTERISTICS OF THE 50-MEV RACETRACK MICROTRON [J].
KARLSSON, M ;
NYSTROM, H ;
SVENSSON, H .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) :307-315
[9]   Investigation of variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo photon dose calculation using XVMC [J].
Kawrakow, I ;
Fippel, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (08) :2163-2183
[10]   Monte Carlo dose calculations for dynamic IMRT treatments [J].
Keall, PJ ;
Siebers, JV ;
Arnfield, M ;
Kim, JO ;
Mohan, R .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (04) :929-941