A more realistic estimate of the variances and systematic errors in spherical harmonic geomagnetic field models

被引:25
作者
Lowes, FJ [1 ]
Olsen, N
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Dept Phys, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Danish Space Res Inst, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
关键词
geomagnetic field; serial correlation; spherical harmonic analysis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02256.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Most modern spherical harmonic geomagnetic models based on satellite data include estimates of the variances of the spherical harmonic coefficients of the model; these estimates are based on the geometry of the data and the fitting functions, and on the magnitude of the residuals. However, the accuracy of these estimates depends on the correctness of various assumptions, some of which are in practice not valid. Using the Orsted OSVM model as an example, we show that ignoring the serial correlation of the magnetospheric 'noise' in the data, and not solving separately for the ionospheric field, led to quite inaccurate variance estimates. We estimate correction factors which range from 1/4 to 20, with the largest increases being for the zonal, m = 0, and sectorial, m = n, terms. With no correction, the OSVM variances give a mean-square vector field error of prediction over the Earth's surface at sea level of 1.5 nT(2) (for the field of degrees n = 1-13); applying our correction increases this to 3.5 nT(2). The leakage of the ionospheric field into the solution also gave a large systematic error field, of magnitude about 6 nT. We discuss how our approach is applicable to other similar modelling approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1044
页数:18
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
ASHOUR AA, 1965, GEOPHYS J ROY ASTRON, V10, P1
[2]   FLUID-FLOW NEAR THE SURFACE OF EARTHS OUTER CORE [J].
BLOXHAM, J ;
JACKSON, A .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 1991, 29 (01) :97-120
[3]   A PROPOSED MODEL FOR INTERNATIONAL GEOMAGNETIC REFERENCE FIELD-1965 [J].
CAIN, JC ;
HENDRICKS, SJ ;
LANGEL, RA ;
HUDSON, WV .
JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1967, 19 (04) :335-+
[4]   The treatment of attitude errors in satellite geomagnetic data [J].
Holme, R ;
Bloxham, J .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1996, 98 (3-4) :221-233
[5]   Spherical harmonic analysis, aliasing, and filtering [J].
Jekeli, C .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 1996, 70 (04) :214-223
[6]  
Langel R. A., 1987, GEOMAGNETISM, V1, P249
[7]   UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATES IN GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD MODELING [J].
LANGEL, RA ;
ESTES, RH ;
SABAKA, TJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1989, 94 (B9) :12281-12299
[8]  
LOWES FJ, 1975, GEOPHYS J ROY ASTR S, V42, P637, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb05884.x
[9]   A model of the geomagnetic field and its secular variation for epoch 2000 estimated from Orsted data [J].
Olsen, N .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 149 (02) :454-462
[10]   The influence of correlated crustal signals in modelling the main geomagnetic field [J].
RygaardHjalsted, C ;
Constable, CG ;
Parker, RL .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 130 (03) :717-726