Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis

被引:40
作者
Jesneck, Jonathan L. [1 ]
Nolte, Loren W.
Baker, Jay A.
Floyd, Carey E.
Lo, Joseph Y.
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Adv Imaging Labs, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Phys Grad Program, Durham, NC 27705 USA
关键词
decision fusion; heterogeneous data; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; area under the curve (AUC); partial area under the curve (pAUC); classification; machine learning; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1118/1.2208934
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
As more diagnostic testing options become available to physicians, it becomes more difficult to combine various types of medical information together in order to optimize the overall diagnosis. To improve diagnostic performance, here we introduce an approach to optimize a decision-fusion technique to combine heterogeneous information, such as from different modalities, feature categories, or institutions. For classifier comparison we used two performance metrics: The receiving operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve [area under the ROC curve (AUC)] and the normalized partial area under the curve (pAUC). This study used four classifiers: Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), artificial neural network (ANN), and two variants of our decision-fusion technique, AUC-optimized (DF-A) and pAUC-optimized (DF-P) decision fusion. We applied each of these classifiers with 100-fold cross-validation to two heterogeneous breast cancer data sets: One of mass lesion features and a much more challenging one of microcalcification lesion features. For the calcification data set, DF-A outperformed the other classifiers in terms of AUC (p < 0.02) and achieved AUC = 0.85 +/- 0.01. The DF-P surpassed the other classifiers in terms of pAUC (p < 0.01) and reached pAUC = 0.38 +/- 0.02. For the mass data set, DF-A outperformed both the ANN and the LDA (p < 0.04) and achieved AUC = 0.94 +/- 0.01. Although for this data set there were no statistically significant differences among the classifiers' pAUC values (pAUC = 0.57 +/- 0.07 to 0.67 +/- 0.05, p > 0.10), the DF-P did significantly improve specificity versus the LDA at both 98% and 100% sensitivity (p < 0.04). In conclusion, decision fusion directly optimized clinically significant performance measures, such as AUC and pAUC, and sometimes outperformed two well-known machine-learning techniques when applied to two different breast cancer data sets. (C) 2006 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2945 / 2954
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
*BI RADS AM COLL R, 1998, REP DAT SYST
[2]   Tolerance to missing data using a likelihood ratio based classifier for computer-aided classification of breast cancer [J].
Bilska-Wolak, AO ;
Floyd, CE .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (18) :4219-4237
[3]   Computer aid for decision to biopsy breast masses on mammography: Validation on new cases [J].
Bilska-Wolak, AO ;
Floyd, CE ;
Lo, JY ;
Baker, JA .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (06) :671-680
[4]   Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses; performance comparison to case-based reasoning [J].
Bilska-Wolak, AO ;
Floyd, CE ;
Nolte, LW ;
Lo, JY .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (05) :949-958
[5]   Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: A multiinstitutional trial [J].
Brem, RF ;
Baum, J ;
Lechner, M ;
Kaplan, S ;
Souders, S ;
Naul, LG ;
Hoffmeister, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (03) :687-693
[6]  
Burhenne LJW, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V215, P554
[7]  
Cady B, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P1699, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010501)91:9<1699::AID-CNCR1186>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-W
[9]   OPTIMAL DATA FUSION IN MULTIPLE SENSOR DETECTION SYSTEMS [J].
CHAIR, Z ;
VARSHNEY, PK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1986, 22 (01) :98-101
[10]   Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces [J].
Chan, HP ;
Sahiner, B ;
Lam, KL ;
Petrick, N ;
Helvie, MA ;
Goodsitt, MM ;
Adler, DD .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :2007-2019