Small dose of propofol for preventing nausea and vomiting after third molar extraction

被引:8
作者
Fujii, Y
Uemura, A
Nakano, M
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Inst Clin Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058576, Japan
[2] Univ Tsukuba, Inst Clin Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058576, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1053/joms.2002.35720
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The study goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a small dose of propofol for the prevention of nausea and vomiting following third molar extraction. Patients and Methods: In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 90 women received placebo or propofol at 2 different doses (0.25 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg) (n=30 of each) intravenously at the end of surgery. A standard general anesthestic technique, including sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen, was employed throughout the surgical procedure. Emetic episodes and safety assessments were performed during 0 to 3 hours and 3 to 24 hours after after anesthesia. Results: The rate of patients experiencing emesis-free (no nausea, retching, or vomiting) during 0 to 3 hours after anesthesia was 60% with placebo, 66% with propofol 0.25 mg/kg (P=.395), and 90% with propofol 0.5 mg/kg (P=.001); the corresponding rate during 3 to 24 hours after anesthesia was 60%, 63% (P=0.5), and 87% (P=.02) (P values compared with placebo). No clinically serious adverse effects due to the study drug were observed in any group. Conclusions: Prophylactic therapy with a small dose (0.5 mg/kg) of propofol is effective for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in female patients undergoing general anesthesia for third molar extractions. (C) 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1246 / 1249
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BORGEAT A, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, P539
[2]   INDUCTION AND RECOVERY CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOFOL, THIOPENTAL AND ETOMIDATE [J].
BOYSEN, K ;
SANCHEZ, R ;
KRINTEL, JJ ;
HANSEN, M ;
HAAR, PM ;
DYRBERG, V .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 33 (08) :689-692
[3]   PROPOFOL NITROUS OXIDE VERSUS THIOPENTAL-ISOFLURANE NITROUS OXIDE FOR GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
DOZE, VA ;
SHAFER, A ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (01) :63-71
[4]   Effects of propofol on ipecacuanha-induced nausea and vomiting [J].
Hammas, B ;
Hvarfner, A ;
Thörn, SE ;
Wattwil, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 42 (04) :447-451
[5]   ARE ANTIEMETICS COST-EFFECTIVE FOR CHILDREN [J].
LERMAN, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (04) :263-266
[6]   POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING - A COMPARISON BETWEEN INTRAVENOUS AND INHALATION ANESTHESIA IN BREAST SURGERY [J].
ODDBYMUHRBECK, E ;
JAKOBSSON, J ;
ANDERSSON, L ;
ASKERGREN, J .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 38 (01) :52-56
[7]   NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN DAY-CASE DENTAL-ANESTHESIA - THE USE OF LOW-DOSE DROPERIDOL [J].
ODONOVAN, N ;
SHAW, J .
ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 39 (12) :1172-1176
[8]  
OSTMAN PL, 1990, ANESTH ANALG, V71, P536
[9]   THE MENSTRUAL-CYCLE AND NAUSEA OR VOMITING AFTER WISDOM TEETH EXTRACTION [J].
RAMSAY, TM ;
MCDONALD, PF ;
FARAGHER, EB .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1994, 41 (09) :798-801
[10]  
SMITH I, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V81, P1005