Nifedipine versus tamsulosin for the management of lower ureteral stones

被引:183
作者
Porpiglia, F
Ghignone, G
Fiori, C
Fontana, D
Scarpa, RM
机构
[1] Univ Turin, San Luigi Hosp, Div Urol, Dept Clin & Biol Sci, I-10043 Orbassano, Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, San Giovanni Battista Hosp, Div Urol, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
关键词
ureter; urinary calculi; nifedipine; corticosteroids;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000132390.61756.ff
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluate and compare the effectiveness of 2 different medical therapies during watchful waiting in patients with lower ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: A total of 86 patients with stones less than 1 cm located in the lower ureter (juxtavesical or intramural tract) were enrolled in the study and were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (30) and 2 (28) patients received daily oral treatment of 30 mg deflazacort, (maximum 10 days). In addition group 1 patients received 30 mg nifedipine slow-release (maximum 28 days) and group 2 received 1 daily oral therapy of 0.4 mg tamsulosin (maximum 28 days), Group 3 patients (28) were used as controls. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's test, ANOVA test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Results: The average stone size for groups 1 to 3 was 4.7, 5.42 and 5.35 mm, respectively, which was not statistically significant. Expulsion was observed in 24 of 30 patients in group 1 (80%), 24 of 28 in group 2 (85%) and 12 of 28 in group 3 (43%). The difference in groups 1 and 2 with respect to group 3 was significant. Average expulsion time for groups 1 to 3 was 9.3, 7.7 and 12 days, respectively. A statistically significant difference was noted between groups 2 and 3. Mean sodium diclofenac dosage per patient in groups 1 to 3 was 19.5, 26, and 105 mg, respectively. A statistical significant difference was observed between groups 1 and 2 with respect to group 3. Conclusions: Medical treatments with nifedipine and tamsulosin proved to be safe and effective as demonstrated by the increased stone expulsion rate and reduced need for analgesic therapy. Moreover medical therapy, particularly in regard to tamsulosin, reduced expulsion time.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 571
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BAJOR G, 1990, International Urology and Nephrology, V22, P33
[2]   NIFEDIPINE AND METHYLPREDNISOLONE IN FACILITATING URETERAL STONE PASSAGE - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY [J].
BORGHI, L ;
MESCHI, T ;
AMATO, F ;
NOVARINI, A ;
GIANNINI, A ;
QUARANTELLI, C ;
MINEO, F .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (04) :1095-1098
[3]  
Carstensen H E, 1973, Acta Chir Scand Suppl, V433, P66
[4]  
Cervenakov I., 2002, International Urology and Nephrology, V34, P25
[5]   Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT [J].
Coll, DM ;
Varanelli, MJ ;
Smith, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (01) :101-103
[6]   Efficacy of tamsulosin in the medical management of juxtavesical ureteral stones [J].
Dellabella, M ;
Milanese, G ;
Muzzonigro, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :2202-2205
[7]   FREQUENCY OF UROLITHIASIS IN A PREPAID MEDICAL-CARE PROGRAM [J].
HIATT, RA ;
DALES, LG ;
FRIEDMAN, GD ;
HUNKELER, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1982, 115 (02) :255-265
[8]  
HUBNER WA, 1993, EUR UROL, V24, P172
[9]   URETEROSCOPY AND URETERAL CALCULI - HOW USEFUL [J].
KINDER, RB ;
OSBORN, DE ;
FLYNN, JT ;
SMART, JG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 60 (06) :506-508
[10]   Management of ureteral calculi: A cost comparison and decision making analysis [J].
Lotan, Y ;
Gettman, MT ;
Roehrborn, CG ;
Cadeddu, JA ;
Pearle, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1621-1629