A Linear-Programming Approximation of AC Power Flows

被引:203
作者
Coffrin, Carleton [1 ]
Van Hentenryck, Pascal [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NICTA, Optimizat Res Grp, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] NICTA, Optimizat Res Grp, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
DC power flow; AC power flow; LP power flow; polyhedral relaxation; power system analysis; capacitor placement; power system restoration; PLACEMENT; SECURITY; ALGORITHM; STRATEGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1287/ijoc.2014.0594
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Linear active-power-only power flow approximations are pervasive in the planning and control of power systems. However, AC power systems are governed by a system of nonlinear nonconvex power flow equations. Existing linear approximations fail to capture key power flow variables, including reactive power and voltage magnitudes, both of which are necessary in many applications that require voltage management and AC power flow feasibility. This paper proposes novel linear-programming models (the LPAC models) that incorporate reactive power and voltage magnitudes in a linear power flow approximation. The LPAC models are built on a polyhedral relaxation of the cosine terms in the AC equations as well as Taylor approximations of the remaining nonlinear terms. Experimental comparisons with AC solutions on a variety of standard IEEE and Matpower benchmarks show that the LPAC models produce accurate values for active and reactive power, phase angles, and voltage magnitudes. The potential benefits of the LPAC models are illustrated on two "proof-of-concept" studies in power restoration and capacitor placement.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 734
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[51]  
Stott B., 1979, 1979 Power Industry Computer Applications ConferencePICA-79, P142
[52]   DC Power Flow Revisited [J].
Stott, Brian ;
Jardim, Jorge ;
Alsac, Ongun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2009, 24 (03) :1290-1300
[53]  
TAYLOR J, 2011, TLS TIMES LIT S 0422, P26
[54]   IMPROVED ALGORITHM FOR OPTIMUM REACTIVE POWER ALLOCATION [J].
THUKARAM, D ;
PARTHASARATHY, K ;
PRIOR, DL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 1984, 6 (02) :72-74
[55]  
University of Washington Electrical Engineering, 1999, POW SYST TEST CAS AR
[56]  
Wang X., 1994, MODERN POWER SYSTEM, V3rd
[57]   A non-incremental model for optimal control of reactive power flow [J].
Wang, ZD ;
Peng, D ;
Feng, QS ;
Liu, HJ ;
Yu, DC .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1996, 39 (02) :153-159
[58]   REAL-TIME OPTIMIZER FOR SECURITY DISPATCH [J].
WOLLENBERG, BF ;
STADLIN, WO .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1974, PA93 (05) :1640-1649
[59]   MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education [J].
Zimmerman, Ray Daniel ;
Edmundo Murillo-Sanchez, Carlos ;
Thomas, Robert John .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2011, 26 (01) :12-19
[60]  
[No title captured]