Comparative overview of current international strategies and guidelines for genetic toxicology testing for regulatory purposes

被引:114
作者
Cimino, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Pollut Prevent & Tox, Risk Assessment Div, Sci Support Branch, Washington, DC 20460 USA
关键词
testing battery; guidance; mutagenicity; SAR; hazard assessment;
D O I
10.1002/em.20216
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
National and international regulatory agencies historically have used genotoxicity information as part of a weight-of-evidence approach to evaluate potential human carcinogenicity. Additionally, some agencies consider heritable mutation a regulatory endpoint. Furthermore, genotoxicity has the potential to contribute to other adverse health conditions. This article provides a comparative overview of the testing strategies used by regulatory agencies throughout the world. Despite minor variations in details, the genotoxicity test schemes for most regulatory entities generally comprise three tests: a bacterial gene mutation assay, an in vitro mammalian cell assay for gene mutation and/or chromosome aberrations, and often an in vivo assay for chromosomal effects. In some cases, fewer than these three tests are required. In other cases, when exposure data, structure-activity considerations, or other factors wardrant, even chemicals negative in the three baseline tests may be subject to additional testing. If genotoxicity is identified by the baseline screening tests, assessment of the ability of the chemical to interact with DNA in the gonad may be required. This may apply regardless of whether or not a cancer bioassay has been triggered. Mutagens positive in second stage gonadal assay(s) may be tested in third stage in vivo rodent tests to provide data for a quantitative risk assessment. In all testing, the utilization of internationally-recognized protocols, where they exist, is advisable, although not in all instances required. When testing for regulatory purposes, it is advisable to verify the testing program with the specific regulatory body or bodies responsible for regulatory oversight before beginning testing.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 390
页数:29
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [31] *ICH, 1997, 3M ICH
  • [32] *ICH, 1995, S3A ICH
  • [33] ICH, 1996, ICH TOP S1A NEED CAR
  • [34] ICH Q3A, 2003, Q3A ICH
  • [35] Use of genotoxicity data to positive genetox findings on or impurity .... Now what?
    Jacobson-Kram, D
    Jacobs, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 24 (03) : 129 - 133
  • [36] Jena G. B., 2002, Indian Journal of Pharmacology, V34, P86
  • [37] Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology:: An appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes
    Kirkland, DJ
    Henderson, L
    Marzin, D
    Müller, L
    Parry, JM
    Speit, G
    Tweats, DJ
    Williams, GM
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2005, 588 (02) : 88 - 105
  • [38] Summary of major conclusions
    Kirkland, DJ
    Hayashi, M
    MacGregor, JT
    Müller, L
    Schechtman, LM
    Sofuni, I
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2003, 540 (02) : 123 - 125
  • [39] Detailed review of transgenic rodent mutation assays
    Lambert, LB
    Singer, TM
    Boucher, SE
    Douglas, GR
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2005, 590 (1-3) : 1 - 280
  • [40] Lewtas J., 1994, METHODS GENETIC RISK, P125