Biased information search in group decision making

被引:252
作者
Schulz-Hardt, S
Frey, D
Lüthgens, C
Moscovici, S
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Social Psychol Unit, Inst Psychol, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Ecole Hautes Etud Sci Sociales, Lab Psychol Sociale, Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.655
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research has shown that people prefer supporting to conflicting information when making decisions. Whether this biased information search also occurs in group decision making was examined in three experiments. Experiment 1 indicated that groups as well as individuals prefer supporting information and that the strength of this bias depends on the distribution of the group members' initial decision preferences. The more group members had chosen the same alternative prior to the group discussion (group homogeneity), the more strongly the group preferred information supporting that alternative. Experiment 2 replicated these results with managers. Experiment 3 showed that the differences between homogeneous and heterogeneous groups reflect group-level processes. Higher commitment and confidence in homogeneous groups mediated this effect. Functional and dysfunctional aspects of biased information seeking in group decision making are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 669
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[2]  
Bass B.M., 1983, ORG DECISION MAKING
[3]   ALTERING INFORMATION TO GAIN ACTION CONTROL - FUNCTIONAL-ASPECTS OF HUMAN INFORMATION-PROCESSING IN DECISION-MAKING [J].
BECKMANN, J ;
KUHL, J .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1984, 18 (02) :224-237
[4]   Instrumental bias in motivated reasoning: More when more is needed [J].
Boiney, LG ;
Kennedy, J ;
Nye, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 72 (01) :1-24
[5]  
Bovens M., 1996, Understanding policy fiascoes
[6]  
BRODBECK FC, 2000, UNPUB DISSEMINATION
[8]  
CHAIKEN S, 1989, P212
[9]   HEURISTIC PROCESSING CAN BIAS SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING - EFFECTS OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY, ARGUMENT AMBIGUITY, AND TASK IMPORTANCE ON ATTITUDE JUDGMENT [J].
CHAIKEN, S ;
MAHESWARAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (03) :460-473
[10]   THE STRUCTURE OF GROUP COHESION [J].
COTA, AA ;
EVANS, CR ;
DION, KL ;
KILIK, L ;
LONGMAN, RS .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1995, 21 (06) :572-580