Dexmedetomidine does not increase the incidence of intracarotid shunting in patients undergoing awake carotid endarterectorny

被引:18
作者
Bekker, Alex
Gold, Mark
Ahmed, Raza
Kim, Jung
Rockman, Caron
Jacobovitz, Glenn
Riles, Thomas
Fisch, Gene
机构
[1] NYU Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Yeshiva Univ, Dept Appl Sci, New York, NY 10033 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000237288.46912.39
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Systemic administration of dexmedetomidine (DEX) decreases cerebral bloodflow (CBF) via direct alpha-2-mediated constriction of cerebral blood vessels and indirectly via its effect on the intrinsic neural pathway modulating vascular smooth muscle. Reduction in CBF without a concomitant decrease in cerebral metabolic rate has raised concerns that DEX may limit adequate cerebral oxygenation of brain tissue in patients with already compromised cerebral circulation (e.g., carotid endarterectomy [CEA]). In this study, we established the incidence of intraarterial shunting used as a sign of inadequate oxygen delivery in a consecutive series of 123 awake CEA performed in our institution using DEX as a primary sedative. Data were prospectively recorded in 151 patients who underwent CEA during the study period. Eighteen patients were sedated with midazolam and fentanyl (M/F) for medical or logistical reasons. Patients thought to be at risk of an intraoperative stroke were treated with a prophylactic intraarterial shunt. These patients, as well as those who required general anesthesia, were excluded from the final analysis. Five patients (4.3%) in the DEX group required intraarterial shunts. The incidence of shunting in patient undergoing awake CEA in our institution is 10% (historical control). No patients developed a stroke or other serious complications. It appears that the use of DEX as a primary sedative drug for CEA does not increase the incidence of intraarterial shunts.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 958
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Asano Yoshio, 1997, American Journal of Physiology, V272, pH2547
[2]   Regional anaesthesia and propofol sedation for carotid endarterectomy [J].
Barringer, C ;
Williams, JM ;
McCrirrick, A ;
Earnshaw, JJ .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 75 (07) :546-549
[3]   Dexmedetomidine for neurological surgery [J].
Bekker, A ;
Sturaitis, MK .
NEUROSURGERY, 2005, 57 (01) :1-9
[4]  
Bekker A, 2004, J NEUROSURG ANESTH, V16, P320, DOI 10.1097/00008506-200410000-00016
[5]   Dexmedetomidine for awake carotid endarterectomy: Efficacy, hemodynamic profile, and side effects [J].
Bekker, AY ;
Basile, J ;
Gold, M ;
Riles, T ;
Adelman, M ;
Cuff, G ;
Mathew, JP ;
Goldberg, JD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 16 (02) :126-135
[6]   A controlled prospective study of neuropsychological dysfunction following carotid endarterectomy [J].
Heyer, EJ ;
Sharma, R ;
Rampersad, A ;
Winfree, CJ ;
Mack, WJ ;
Solomon, RA ;
Todd, GJ ;
McCormick, PC ;
McMurtry, JG ;
Quest, DO ;
Stern, Y ;
Lazar, RM ;
Connolly, ES .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (02) :217-222
[7]   MECHANISMS OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE-INDUCED CEREBROVASCULAR EFFECTS IN CANINE IN-VIVO EXPERIMENTS [J].
ISHIYAMA, T ;
DOHI, S ;
IIDA, H ;
WATANABE, Y ;
SHIMONAKA, H .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (06) :1208-1215
[8]  
KALRSSON B, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V71, P125
[9]   A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus conventional therapy for sedation and hemodynamic control during carotid endarterectomy performed under regional anesthesia [J].
McCutcheon, CA ;
Orme, RM ;
Scott, DA ;
Davies, MJ ;
McGlade, DP .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (03) :668-675
[10]  
Pasternak JJ, 2005, J NEUROSURG ANESTH, V17, P2