MRI accuracy in residual disease evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:88
作者
Belli, P.
Costantini, M.
Malaspina, C.
Magistrelli, A.
LaTorre, G.
Bonomo, L.
机构
[1] Univ Sacred Heart, Dept Bioimaging & Radiol Sci, Inst Hyg, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Sacred Heart, Dept Epidemiol, Inst Hyg, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Sacred Heart, Biostat Unit, Inst Hyg, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2006.07.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large breast cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five women with large breast cancers underwent MRI mammography before and after neoadjuvant chemo therapy (three or six cycles). Dynamic MRI was performed using a 1.5 T unit using three-dimensional FSPGR sequences. For each patient tumour size, tumour volume and dynamic curve were obtained before and after neoadjuvant treatment. Residual tumour sizes obtained using MRI were compared with pathological findings to assess the accuracy of MRI in detecting and in measuring residual tumour. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in detecting residual disease was 90.5, 100, and 91.3%, respectively. The mean of largest diameters measured at histology and at MRI were 26 and 28.2 mm, respectively. The tumour size correlation coefficient between MRI and pathology measurements was very high: r(2) = 0.9657 (p < 0.0001). The interclass correlation coefficient between preoperative imaging measurements and pathological measurements of residual disease was 0.944 (95% CI: 0.906-0.982). CONCLUSION: The presence and size of residual disease in breast patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be accurately evaluated using MRI. (c) 2006 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 953
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Abraham DC, 1996, CANCER, V78, P91, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<91::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-2
[3]  
AISNER J, 1982, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V117, P882
[4]   Correlation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging with precise histopathological map concerning carcinoma extension in the breast [J].
Amano, G ;
Ohuchi, N ;
Ishibashi, T ;
Ishida, T ;
Amari, M ;
Satomi, S .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2000, 60 (01) :43-55
[5]   Imaging in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment benefits of MRI [J].
Balu-Maestro, C ;
Chapellier, C ;
Bleuse, A ;
Chanalet, I ;
Chauvel, C ;
Largillier, R .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2002, 72 (02) :145-152
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   BREAST-TUMORS - COMPARATIVE ACCURACY OF MR-IMAGING RELATIVE TO MAMMOGRAPHY AND US FOR DEMONSTRATING EXTENT [J].
BOETES, C ;
MUS, RDM ;
HOLLAND, R ;
BARENTSZ, JO ;
STRIJK, SP ;
WOBBES, T ;
HENDRIKS, JHCL ;
RUYS, SHJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) :743-747
[8]  
BONADONNA G, 1992, CANCER RES, V52, P2127
[9]  
CALAIS G, 1994, CANCER, V74, P1283, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940815)74:4<1283::AID-CNCR2820740417>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-S