MRI accuracy in residual disease evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:88
作者
Belli, P.
Costantini, M.
Malaspina, C.
Magistrelli, A.
LaTorre, G.
Bonomo, L.
机构
[1] Univ Sacred Heart, Dept Bioimaging & Radiol Sci, Inst Hyg, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Sacred Heart, Dept Epidemiol, Inst Hyg, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Sacred Heart, Biostat Unit, Inst Hyg, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2006.07.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large breast cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five women with large breast cancers underwent MRI mammography before and after neoadjuvant chemo therapy (three or six cycles). Dynamic MRI was performed using a 1.5 T unit using three-dimensional FSPGR sequences. For each patient tumour size, tumour volume and dynamic curve were obtained before and after neoadjuvant treatment. Residual tumour sizes obtained using MRI were compared with pathological findings to assess the accuracy of MRI in detecting and in measuring residual tumour. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in detecting residual disease was 90.5, 100, and 91.3%, respectively. The mean of largest diameters measured at histology and at MRI were 26 and 28.2 mm, respectively. The tumour size correlation coefficient between MRI and pathology measurements was very high: r(2) = 0.9657 (p < 0.0001). The interclass correlation coefficient between preoperative imaging measurements and pathological measurements of residual disease was 0.944 (95% CI: 0.906-0.982). CONCLUSION: The presence and size of residual disease in breast patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be accurately evaluated using MRI. (c) 2006 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 953
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   MRI of breast cancer: Influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity [J].
Rieber, A ;
Zeitler, H ;
Rosenthal, H ;
Gorich, J ;
Kreienberg, R ;
Brambs, HJ ;
Tomczak, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (833) :452-458
[32]   Breast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Rieber, A ;
Brambs, HJ ;
Gabelmann, A ;
Heilmann, V ;
Kreienberg, R ;
Kühn, T .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (07) :1711-1719
[33]  
Schnall M D, 2001, Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, V9, P289
[34]  
SCHWARTZ GF, 1994, CANCER, V73, P362, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940115)73:2<362::AID-CNCR2820730221>3.0.CO
[35]  
2-L
[36]   Angiogenesis and dynamic MR imaging gadolinium enhancement of malignant and benign breast lesions [J].
Stomper, PC ;
Winston, JS ;
Herman, S ;
Klippenstein, DL ;
Arredondo, MA ;
Blumenson, LE .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1997, 45 (01) :39-46
[37]   Locally advanced breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy: Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic evaluation of residual disease [J].
Trecate, G ;
Ceglia, E ;
Stabile, F ;
Tesoro-Tess, JD ;
Mariani, G ;
Zambetti, M ;
Musumeci, R .
TUMORI, 1999, 85 (04) :220-228
[38]   Can breast MRI help in the management of women with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy? [J].
Warren, RML ;
Bobrow, LG ;
Earl, HM ;
Britton, PD ;
Gopalan, D ;
Purushotham, AD ;
Wishart, GC ;
Benson, JR ;
Hollingworth, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (07) :1349-1360
[39]   Accuracy of tumor size measuremen in breast cancer using MRI is influenced by histological regression induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Wasser, K ;
Sinn, HP ;
Fink, C ;
Klein, SK ;
Junkermann, H ;
Lüdemann, HP ;
Zuna, I ;
Delorme, S .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (06) :1213-1223
[40]   MRI vs. histologic measurement of breast cancer following chemotherapy: Comparison with X-ray mammography and palpation [J].
Weatherall, PT ;
Evans, GF ;
Metzger, GJ ;
Saborrian, MH ;
Leitch, AM .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (06) :868-875