How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice?

被引:236
作者
Davies, Islay
Green, Peter
Rosemann, Michael
Indulska, Marta
Gallo, Stan
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Informat Technol, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, Ipswich, Qld 4305, Australia
关键词
conceptual modeling; business systems analysis; modeling techniques; modeling tools; project size; modeler experience;
D O I
10.1016/j.datak.2005.07.007
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Much research has been devoted over the years to investigating and advancing the techniques and tools used by analysts when they model. As opposed to what academics, software providers and their resellers promote as should be happening, the aim of this research was to determine whether practitioners still embraced conceptual modeling seriously. In addition, what are the most popular techniques and tools used for conceptual modeling? What are the major purposes for which conceptual modeling is used? The study found that the top six most frequently used modeling techniques and methods were ER diagramming, data flow diagramming, systems flowcharting, workflow modeling, UML, and structured charts. Modeling technique use was found to decrease significantly from smaller to medium-sized organizations, but then to increase significantly in larger organizations (proxying for large, complex projects). Technique use was also found to significantly follow an inverted U-shaped curve, contrary to some prior explanations. Additionally, an important contribution of this study was the identification of the factors that uniquely influence the decision of analysts to continue to use modeling, viz., communication (using diagrams) to/from stakeholders, internal knowledge (lack of) of techniques, user expectations management, understanding models' integration into the business, and tool/software deficiencies. The highest ranked purposes for which modeling was undertaken were database design and management, business process documentation, business process improvement, and software development. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 380
页数:23
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Where now for development methodologies? [J].
Avison, DE ;
Fitzgerald, G .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2003, 46 (01) :78-82
[2]   A REAPPRAISAL OF STRUCTURED ANALYSIS - DESIGN IN AN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT [J].
BANSLER, JP ;
BODKER, K .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1993, 11 (02) :165-193
[3]   Conceptual data modelling in theory and practice [J].
Batra, D ;
Marakas, GM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1995, 4 (03) :185-193
[4]  
Chang S., 2003, 14 AUSTR C INF SYST
[5]  
CURTIS B, 1998, COMMUNICATIONS ACM, V31
[6]   Am empirical investigation into the adoption of systems development methodologies [J].
Fitzgerald, B .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 1998, 34 (06) :317-328
[7]  
FITZGERALD B, 1997, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, V7, P121
[8]  
FLOYD C, 1986, COMP EVALUATION SYST, P19
[9]   EVALUATION OF PROCESS TOOLS IN SYSTEMS-ANALYSIS [J].
GORLA, N ;
PU, HC ;
ROM, WO .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 37 (02) :119-126
[10]   Factors affecting perceptions of CASE effectiveness [J].
Iivari, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1995, 4 (03) :143-158