The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Clustering of galaxies in early data

被引:155
作者
Coil, AL
Davis, M
Madgwick, DS
Newman, JA
Conselice, CJ
Cooper, M
Ellis, RS
Faber, SM
Finkbeiner, DP
Guhathakurta, P
Kaiser, N
Koo, DC
Phillips, AC
Steidel, CC
Weiner, BJ
Willmer, CNA
Yan, RB
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Astron, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] CALTECH, Dept Astron, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Univ Calif Observ, Lick Observ, Dept Astron & Astrophys, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[4] Princeton Univ Observ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[5] Natl Res Council Canada, Herzberg Inst Astrophys, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada
[6] Univ Hawaii, Inst Astron, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
galaxies : distances and redshifts; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : statistics; large-scale structure of universe; surveys;
D O I
10.1086/421337
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We measure the two-point correlation function xi(r(p), pi) in a sample of 2219 galaxies between z = 0.7 and 1.35 to a magnitude limit of R-AB = 24.1 from the first season of the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey. From xi(r(p), pi) we recover the real-space correlation function, xi(r), which we find can be approximated within the errors by a power law, xi(r) (r/r(0))(-gamma), on scales similar to0.1-10 h(-1) Mpc. In a sample with an effective redshift of z(eff) = 0.82, for a LambdaCDM cosmology we find r(0) 3.53 +/- 0.81 h(-1) Mpc (comoving) and gamma = 1.66 +/- 0.12, while in a higher redshift sample with z(eff) = 1.14 we find r(0) = 3.12 +/- 0.72 h(-1) Mpc and gamma = 1.66 +/- 0.12. These errors are estimated from mock galaxy catalogs and are dominated by the cosmic variance present in the current data sample. We find that red, absorption-dominated, passively evolving galaxies have a larger clustering scale length, r0, than blue, emission-line, actively star-forming galaxies. Intrinsically brighter galaxies also cluster more strongly than fainter galaxies at z similar or equal to 1. Our results imply that the DEEP2 galaxies have an effective bias b = 0.96 +/- 0.13 if sigma(8DM) = 1 today or b = 1.19 +/- 0.16 if sigma(8DM) = 0.8 today. This bias is lower than that predicted by semianalytic simulations at z similar or equal to 1, which may be the result of our R-band target selection. We discuss possible evolutionary effects within our survey volume, and we compare our results with galaxy-clustering studies at other redshifts, noting that our star-forming sample at z similar or equal to 1 has selection criteria very similar to the Lyman break galaxies at z similar or equal to 3 and that our red, absorption-line sample displays a clustering strength comparable to the expected clustering of the Lyman break galaxy descendants at z similar or equal to 1. Our results demonstrate that galaxy-clustering properties as a function of color, spectral type, and luminosity seen in the local universe were largely in place by z similar or equal to 1.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 538
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[51]   The Las Campanas Redshift Survey galaxy-galaxy autocorrelation function [J].
Tucker, DL ;
Oemler, A ;
Kirshner, RP ;
Lin, H ;
Shectman, SA ;
Landy, SD ;
Schechter, PL ;
Muller, V ;
Gottlober, S ;
Einasto, J .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1997, 285 (01) :L5-L9
[52]   The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the bias of galaxies and the density of the Universe [J].
Verde, L ;
Heavens, AF ;
Percival, WJ ;
Matarrese, S ;
Baugh, CM ;
Bland-Hawthorn, J ;
Bridges, T ;
Cannon, R ;
Cole, S ;
Colless, M ;
Collins, C ;
Couch, W ;
Dalton, G ;
De Propris, R ;
Driver, SP ;
Efstathiou, G ;
Ellis, RS ;
Frenk, CS ;
Glazebrook, K ;
Jackson, C ;
Lahav, O ;
Lewis, I ;
Lumsden, S ;
Maddox, S ;
Madgwick, D ;
Norberg, P ;
Peacock, JA ;
Peterson, BA ;
Sutherland, W ;
Taylor, K .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 335 (02) :432-440
[53]   Southern sky redshift survey: Clustering of local galaxies [J].
Willmer, CNA ;
da Costa, LN ;
Pellegrini, PS .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 115 (03) :869-884
[54]   Mock catalogs for the DEEP2 redshift survey [J].
Yan, RB ;
White, M ;
Coil, AL .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 607 (02) :739-750
[55]   The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary [J].
York, DG ;
Adelman, J ;
Anderson, JE ;
Anderson, SF ;
Annis, J ;
Bahcall, NA ;
Bakken, JA ;
Barkhouser, R ;
Bastian, S ;
Berman, E ;
Boroski, WN ;
Bracker, S ;
Briegel, C ;
Briggs, JW ;
Brinkmann, J ;
Brunner, R ;
Burles, S ;
Carey, L ;
Carr, MA ;
Castander, FJ ;
Chen, B ;
Colestock, PL ;
Connolly, AJ ;
Crocker, JH ;
Csabai, I ;
Czarapata, PC ;
Davis, JE ;
Doi, M ;
Dombeck, T ;
Eisenstein, D ;
Ellman, N ;
Elms, BR ;
Evans, ML ;
Fan, XH ;
Federwitz, GR ;
Fiscelli, L ;
Friedman, S ;
Frieman, JA ;
Fukugita, M ;
Gillespie, B ;
Gunn, JE ;
Gurbani, VK ;
de Haas, E ;
Haldeman, M ;
Harris, FH ;
Hayes, J ;
Heckman, TM ;
Hennessy, GS ;
Hindsley, RB ;
Holm, S .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 120 (03) :1579-1587
[56]   Galaxy clustering in early Sloan Digital Sky Survey redshift data [J].
Zehavi, I ;
Blanton, MR ;
Frieman, JA ;
Weinberg, DH ;
Mo, HJ ;
Strauss, MA ;
Anderson, SF ;
Annis, J ;
Bahcall, NA ;
Bernardi, M ;
Briggs, JW ;
Brinkmann, J ;
Burles, S ;
Carey, L ;
Castander, FJ ;
Connolly, AJ ;
Csabai, I ;
Dalcanton, JJ ;
Dodelson, S ;
Doi, M ;
Eisenstein, D ;
Evans, ML ;
Finkbeiner, DP ;
Friedman, S ;
Fukugita, M ;
Gunn, JE ;
Hennessy, GS ;
Hindsley, RB ;
Ivezic, Z ;
Kent, S ;
Knapp, GR ;
Kron, R ;
Kunszt, P ;
Lamb, DQ ;
Leger, RF ;
Long, DC ;
Loveday, J ;
Lupton, RH ;
McKay, T ;
Meiksin, A ;
Merrelli, A ;
Munn, JA ;
Narayanan, V ;
Newcomb, M ;
Nichol, RC ;
Owen, R ;
Peoples, J ;
Pope, A ;
Rockosi, CM ;
Schlegel, D .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 571 (01) :172-190