Complications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation

被引:57
作者
Ortiz, H
Armendariz, P
DeMiguel, M
Ruiz, MD
Alós, R
Roig, JV
机构
[1] Univ Publ Navarra, Hosp Virgen Camino, Serv Cirugia, Unit Coloproctol,Dept Surg, E-31008 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
[2] Hosp Sagunto, Dept Surg, Unit Coloproctol, Sagunbto, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02137.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The postoperative complications and functional outcome following 24 consecutive implantations of an artificial anal sphincter were assessed prospectively. Methods: A total of 24 artificial anal sphincters (Acticon Neosphincter((R)) ) were implanted in 22 patients (mean age 47 years). The mean follow-up period was 28 (range 6-48) months. Results were assessed prospectively by two independent observers at 4-month intervals. The cumulative probability of artificial anal sphincter removal was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Five patients were free of complications. During the postoperative period, complications occurred in nine patients, two of whom required reoperation. During follow-up, complications developed in ten patients, nine of whom were reoperated. Definitive device explantation was necessary in seven patients. The cumulative probability of device explantation was 44 per cent at 48 months. The 15 patients with functioning implants were followed up for a mean of 26 (range 7-48) months. Continence grading improved from a mean of 18 (range 14-20) in the preoperative period to 4 (range 0-14) after operation (P < 0.001). Resting anal canal pressure in patients with a functioning implant increased from a mean of 35 (range 8-87) mmHg before operation to 54 (range 34-70) mmHg after implantation (P < 0.01). Conclusion: An artificial anal sphincter is a useful alternative for refractory faecal incontinence but the incidence of late postoperative complications is high.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 881
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Dodi, 2000, Colorectal Dis, V2, P207, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2000.00157.x
[2]   Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence - Report of 14 consecutive implantations [J].
Lehur, PA ;
Michot, F ;
Denis, P ;
Grise, P ;
Leborgne, J ;
Teniere, P ;
Buzelin, JM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (12) :1352-1355
[3]   Artificial anal sphincter - Prospective clinical and manometric evaluation [J].
Lehur, PA ;
Roig, JV ;
Duinslaeger, M .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (08) :1100-1106
[4]   Standards for anal sphincter replacement [J].
Madoff, RD ;
Baeten, CGMI ;
Christiansen, J ;
Rosen, HR ;
Williams, NS ;
Heine, JA ;
Lehur, PA ;
Lowry, AC ;
Lubowski, DZ ;
Matzel, KE ;
Nicholls, RJ ;
Seccia, M ;
Thorson, AG ;
Wexner, SD ;
Wong, WD .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (02) :135-141
[5]   Reassessing artificial bowel sphincters [J].
Malouf, AJ ;
Vaizey, CJ ;
Kamm, MA ;
Nicholls, RJ .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9222) :2219-2220
[6]  
MARCIO J, 1993, DIS COLON RECTUM, V36, P77
[7]   Restoring control -: The Acticon Neosphincter® artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence [J].
O'Brien, PE ;
Skinner, S .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (09) :1213-1216
[8]   Manometric assessment of an artificial bowel sphincter [J].
Savoye, G ;
Leroi, AM ;
Denis, P ;
Michot, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (05) :586-589
[9]   Clinical, physiological, and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter [J].
Vaizey, CJ ;
Kamm, MA ;
Gold, DM ;
Bartram, CI ;
Halligan, S ;
Nicholls, RJ .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9122) :105-109
[10]  
Wong WD, 1996, DIS COLON RECTUM, V39, P1345