Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome

被引:136
作者
Balmana, Judith
Stockwell, David H.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Stoffel, Elena M.
Deffenbaugh, Amie M.
Reid, Julia E.
Ward, Brian
Scholl, Thomas
Hendrickson, Brant
Tazelaar, John
Burbidge, Lynn Anne
Syngal, Sapna
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Div Populat Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Med Decis Making, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Myriad Genet Labs Inc, Salt Lake City, UT USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2006年 / 296卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.296.12.1469
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Lynch syndrome is caused primarily by mutations in the mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2. Objectives To analyze MLH1/MSH2 mutation prevalence in a large cohort of patients undergoing genetic testing and to develop a clinical model to predict the likelihood of finding a mutation in at-risk patients. Design, Setting, and Participants Personal and family history were obtained for 1914 unrelated probands who submitted blood samples starting in the year 2000 for full gene sequencing of MLH1/MSH2. Genetic analysis was performed using a combination of sequence analysis and Southern blotting. A multivariable model was developed using logistic regression in an initial cohort of 898 individuals and subsequently prospectively validated in 1016 patients. The complex model that we have named PREMM1,2 (Prediction of Mutations in MLH1 and MSH2) was developed into a Web-based tool that incorporates personal and family history of cancer and adenomas. Main Outcome Measure Deleterious mutations in MLH1/MSH2 genes. Results Overall, 14.5% of the probands (130/898) carried a pathogenic mutation (MLH1, 6.5%; MSH2, 8.0%) in the development cohort and 15.3% (155/1016) in the validation cohort, with 42 (27%) of the latter being large rearrangements. Strong predictors of mutations included proband characteristics (presence of colorectal cancer, especially >= 2 separate diagnoses, or endometrial cancer) and family history (especially the number of first-degree relatives with colorectal or endometrial cancer). Age at diagnosis was particularly important for colorectal cancer. The multivariable model discriminated well at external validation, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.84). Conclusions Personal and family history characteristics can accurately predict the outcome of genetic testing in a large population at risk of Lynch syndrome. The PREMM1,2 model provides clinicians with an objective, easy-to-use tool to estimate the likelihood of finding mutations in the MLH1/MSH2 genes and may guide the strategy for molecular evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1478
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease [J].
Aaltonen, LA ;
Salovaara, R ;
Kristo, P ;
Canzian, F ;
Hemminki, A ;
Peltomäki, P ;
Chadwick, RB ;
Kääriäinen, H ;
Eskelinen, M ;
Järvinen, H ;
Mecklin, JP ;
de la Chapelle, A ;
Percesepe, A ;
Ahtola, H ;
Härkönen, N ;
Julkunen, R ;
Kangas, E ;
Ojala, S ;
Tulikoura, J ;
ValKamo, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (21) :1481-1487
[2]   HOW ACCURATE IS SELF-REPORTED FAMILY HISTORY OF COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
AITKEN, J ;
BAIN, C ;
WARD, M ;
SISKIND, V ;
MACLENNAN, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 141 (09) :863-871
[3]   Identification and survival of carriers of mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes in colon cancer [J].
Barnetson, Rebecca A. ;
Tenesa, Albert ;
Farrington, Susan M. ;
Nicholl, Iain D. ;
Cetnarskyj, Roseanne ;
Porteous, Mary E. ;
Campbell, Harry ;
Dunlop, Malcolm G. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (26) :2751-2763
[4]  
Bellacosa A, 1996, AM J MED GENET, V62, P353, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960424)62:4<353::AID-AJMG7>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-S
[6]   The hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: Genetics and clinical implications [J].
Chung, DC ;
Rustgi, AK .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (07) :560-570
[7]   BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer [J].
Couch, FJ ;
DeShano, ML ;
Blackwood, MA ;
Calzone, K ;
Stopfer, J ;
Campeau, L ;
Ganguly, A ;
Rebbeck, T ;
Weber, BL ;
Jablon, L ;
Cobleigh, MA ;
Hoskins, K ;
Garber, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (20) :1409-1415
[8]   AGA technical review on hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testing [J].
Giardiello, FM ;
Brensinger, JD ;
Petersen, GM .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 121 (01) :198-213
[9]   Screening for the Lynch syndrome (Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). [J].
Hampel, H ;
Frankel, WL ;
Martin, E ;
Arnold, M ;
Khanduja, K ;
Kuebler, P ;
Nakagawa, H ;
Sotamaa, K ;
Prior, TW ;
Westman, J ;
Panescu, J ;
Fix, D ;
Lockman, J ;
Comeras, I ;
de la Chapelle, A ;
Ellison, C ;
Melvin, S ;
Winston, J ;
Adeli, A ;
Burak, W ;
Chadwick, R ;
Elkhatib, I ;
Hemingway, T ;
Jamieson, K ;
Johnson, C ;
LaJeunesse, J ;
Liyanarachchi, S ;
Rangel, P ;
Soble, D ;
Walker, M ;
Wise, T ;
Zhang, Y ;
Schlanger, R ;
Aguilar, P ;
Hura, D ;
Keith, J ;
Kerner, B ;
Lavalle, G ;
Taylor, C ;
Vara, T ;
Zangmeister, J ;
DeVictor, S ;
Hines, L ;
Lindsey, M ;
Madhavan, J ;
Padmanabhan, A ;
Hamelberg, K ;
Niemann, T ;
Behrens, BC ;
Blair, SC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (18) :1851-1860
[10]   REGRESSION-MODELS IN CLINICAL-STUDIES - DETERMINING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PREDICTORS AND RESPONSE [J].
HARRELL, FE ;
LEE, KL ;
POLLOCK, BG .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1988, 80 (15) :1198-1202