The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging

被引:231
作者
Ma, Yan [1 ]
Li, Gang [1 ]
Li, Jing [1 ]
Ren, Wei-dong [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Shengjing Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; ULTRASOUND; ENHANCEMENT; SONOGRAPHY; PARAMETERS; BENIGN; MASSES; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000001502
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
The correlation between color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) for detecting blood flow in breast lesions was investigated, as was the diagnostic value of SMI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.These lesions were evaluated using both CDFI and SMI according to Adler's method. Pathologic examination showed 57 malignant lesions and 66 benign lesions. The number of blood vessels in a single mass was detected by 2 techniques (SMI and CDFI), and the difference between the 2 values (SMI-CDFI) was calculated. The optimal threshold for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasms and the diagnostic performances of SMI, CDFI, and SMI-CDFI were calculated.For the total lesions and malignant lesions alone, the difference between SMI and CDFI for detecting blood flow was significant (P<0.01), but the difference was not significant for benign lesions (P=0.15). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.82) for CDFI; 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.89) for SMI; and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95) for SMI-CDFI. Furthermore, the modality of SMI-CDFI showed the best diagnostic performance.SMI provides further microvessel information in breast lesions. The diagnostic modality of SMI-CDFI can improve the diagnostic performance of ultrasound in the differentiation between benign and malignant masses.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
DOPPLER ULTRASOUND COLOR FLOW IMAGING IN THE STUDY OF BREAST-CANCER - PRELIMINARY FINDINGS [J].
ADLER, DD ;
CARSON, PL ;
RUBIN, JM ;
QUINNREID, D .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 16 (06) :553-559
[2]
[Anonymous], MEDICINE BALTIMORE
[3]
[Anonymous], ULTRASOUND Q
[4]
A review of Doppler ultrasound quality assurance protocols and test devices [J].
Browne, Jacinta E. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 30 (07) :742-751
[5]
Hemodynamic parameters by color Doppler ultrasound and dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in palpable T1 breast cancers [J].
Cheung, YC ;
Lo, YF ;
See, LC ;
Chen, SC ;
Chao, TC .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 29 (06) :881-886
[6]
The use of unenhanced Doppler sonography in the evaluation of solid breast lesions [J].
del Cura, JL ;
Elizagaray, E ;
Zabala, R ;
Legórburu, A ;
Grande, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (06) :1788-1794
[7]
Drudi FM, 2012, ULTRASCHALL MED, V33, P416, DOI [10.1055/s-0031-1299408, 10.1055/s-0032-1313201]
[8]
Microvascular architecture of breast lesions - Evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic micro flow imaging [J].
Du, Jing ;
Li, Feng-Hua ;
Fang, Hua ;
Xia, Jian-Guo ;
Zhu, Cai-Xia .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (06) :833-842
[9]
Imaging Tumor Vascularization for Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer [J].
Heijblom, M. ;
Klaase, J. M. ;
van den Engh, F. M. ;
van Leeuwen, T. G. ;
Steenbergen, W. ;
Manohar, S. .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2011, 10 (06) :607-623
[10]
Imaging Studies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer [J].
Heywang-Koebrunner, S. H. ;
Schreer, I ;
Heindel, W. ;
Katalinic, A. .
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 105 (31-32) :541-U29