Thermo-economic analysis for the optimal conceptual design of biomass gasification energy conversion systems

被引:71
作者
Brown, David [1 ]
Gassner, Martin [2 ]
Fuchino, Tetsuo [1 ]
Marechal, Francois [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Inst Technol, Meguro Ward, Tokyo 1528550, Japan
[2] LENI ISE STI EPFL, Stn 9, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Flowshect optimisation; Biomass gasification; Gas cleaning; FLUIDIZED-BED; TAR REMOVAL; CHLORINE DEPOSITION; RESIDUAL BIOMASS; HOT GAS; GASIFIER; FUELS; OPTIMIZATION; PYROLYSIS; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.06.021
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study addresses the thermo-economic assessment of a mid-scale (20 MWth.wood) wood gasification, gas cleaning and energy conversion process, with particular attention given to electricity generation costs and tar control. Product distributions were estimated with a parametric stoichiometric equilibrium model calibrated using atmospheric air gasification data. A multi-objective optimisation problem was defined for a superstructure of alternative energy flow diagrams for each processing step. The trade-off between total investment costs and the exergy efficiency of electricity production was obtained, and analysed to identify operating conditions that minimise tar formation to prevent equipment fouling. The use of air, oxygen or steam fluidised bed gasifiers, closed coupled to an internal combustion engine combined cycle (ICE-CC) requiring cold gas cleaning, or gas turbine combined cycle (GT-CC) requiring hot gas cleaning have been considered. The operating conditions that maximise ICE-CC efficiency with cold gas cleaning (low pressure and high temperatures) also favour minimal tar formation. For GT-CC tar concentrations are higher, but this should not be of concern provided that hot gas cleaning can effectively prevent tar condensation. The trade-off appears to be optimal for steam gasification, with minimal specific costs of 2.1 (sic)/W-e for GT-CC, and 2.7 (sic)/W-e for ICE-CC. However, further calibration of the reaction model is still needed to properly assess product formation for other oxidants than air, and to properly take account of the impact of pressure on product distributions. For air gasification, the minimal specific cost of GT-CC is 2.5 (sic)/W-e, and that of ICE-CC 3.1 (sic)/W-e. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2137 / 2152
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [61] Ten residual biomass fuels for circulating fluidized-bed gasification
    van der Drift, A
    van Doorn, J
    Vermeulen, JW
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2001, 20 (01) : 45 - 56
  • [62] VANDEKAMP W, 2005, 14 EUR BIOM C EXH PA
  • [63] VANSTEIN EE, 2002, 27 INT TECHN C COAL
  • [64] Walawender W.P., 1985, Fundamentals of thermochemical biomass conversion, P897
  • [65] Update on the progress of the Brazilian wood BIG-GT demonstration project
    Waldheim, L
    Carpentieri, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (03): : 525 - 536
  • [66] Biomass gasifier gas turbine power generating technology
    Williams, RH
    Larson, ED
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1996, 10 (2-3) : 149 - 166
  • [67] Catalytic destruction of tar in biomass derived producer gas
    Zhang, RQ
    Brown, RC
    Suby, A
    Cummer, K
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 45 (7-8) : 995 - 1014