A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy

被引:96
作者
Butturini, Giovanni [1 ]
Damoli, Isacco [1 ]
Crepaz, Lorenzo [1 ]
Malleo, Giuseppe [1 ]
Marchegiani, Giovanni [1 ]
Daskalaki, Despoina [1 ]
Esposito, Alessandro [1 ]
Cingarlini, Sara [2 ]
Salvia, Roberto [1 ]
Bassi, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] Verona Univ Hosp Trust, Pancreas Inst, Gen Surg B, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Verona Univ Hosp Trust, Pancreas Inst, Dept Oncol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2015年 / 29卷 / 11期
关键词
Distal pancreatectomy; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; Prospective study; Pancreatic surgery; Robot-assisted surgery; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE; RESECTION; INSTITUTION; DEFINITION; PANCREAS; FISTULA; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-4043-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is increasing in popularity thanks to the benefits that have been recently demonstrated by many authors. The Da Vinci(A (R)) Surgical System could overcome some limits of laparoscopy, helping the surgeons to perform safer and faster difficult procedures. Nowadays, prospective clinical trials comparing LDP to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) are lacking. The aim of this study is to present a prospective comparison between the two techniques. Since November 2011, all patients suitable for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy were assigned either to LDP or RDP, depending on the availability of the Da Vinci(A (R)) Surgical System for our Surgical Unit. Demographics, clinical, and intra- and postoperative data, including estimated costs of the procedure, were prospectively collected. Follow-up included cross-sectional imaging ended on April 2014. Twenty-two patients underwent RDP and 21 LDP; patients' characteristics were similar. The median operative time was longer and procedures' cost was double in RDP group. The conversion to open rate and the median length of postoperative hospital stay were 4.5 % and 7 days, respectively, in both groups. Pancreatic fistula developed in 57.1 % (12/21) and 50 % (11/22) of LDP and RDP, respectively (p = 0.870), being grade A the most frequent. Mortality was nil and an R0 resection was achieved in all Patients. The overall number of lymph nodes harvested was similar between the two groups. Both RDP and LDP are valid techniques for the treatment of distal pancreatic tumors. The advantages of RDP are claimed by many but still under investigation. Some of these advantages are more subjective than objective, and it seems difficult to demonstrate a real superiority of one technique over the other in a standardized fashion. In our experience, laparoscopy has not been abandoned in favor of the robot: we continue to perform both approaches choosing upon single patient's characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:3163 / 3170
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition [J].
Bassi, C ;
Dervenis, C ;
Butturini, G ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Yeo, C ;
Izbicki, J ;
Neoptolemos, J ;
Sarr, M ;
Traverso, W ;
Buchler, M .
SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) :8-13
[2]  
Bona ED, 2012, J PANCREAS, V13, P693, DOI 10.6092/1590-8577/1074
[3]   Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital [J].
Marco Braga ;
Cristina Ridolfi ;
Gianpaolo Balzano ;
Renato Castoldi ;
Nicolò Pecorelli ;
Valerio Di Carlo .
Updates in Surgery, 2012, 64 (3) :179-183
[4]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[5]   Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique [J].
Daouadi, Mustapha ;
Zureikat, Amer H. ;
Zenati, Mazen S. ;
Choudry, Haroon ;
Tsung, Alan ;
Bartlett, David L. ;
Hughes, Steven J. ;
Lee, Ken K. ;
Moser, A. James ;
Zeh, Herbert J. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (01) :128-132
[6]   Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center [J].
Duran, Hipolito ;
Ielpo, Benedetto ;
Caruso, Riccardo ;
Ferri, Valentina ;
Quijano, Yolanda ;
Diaz, Eduardo ;
Fabra, Isabel ;
Oliva, Catalina ;
Olivares, Sergio ;
Vicente, Emilio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2014, 10 (03) :280-285
[7]   A Thick Pancreas Is a Risk Factor for Pancreatic Fistula after a Distal Pancreatectomy: Selection of the Closure Technique according to the Thickness [J].
Eguchi, Hidetoshi ;
Nagano, Hiroaki ;
Tanemura, Masahiro ;
Takeda, Yutaka ;
Marubashi, Shigeru ;
Kobayashi, Shogo ;
Wada, Hiroshi ;
Umeshita, Koji ;
Mori, Masaki ;
Doki, Yuichiro .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 28 (01) :50-56
[8]   Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms:: A critical analysis from a single institution [J].
Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano ;
Cosa, Rebeca ;
Blanco, Laia ;
Levi, Sammy ;
Lopez-Boado, Miguel-Angel ;
Navarro, Salvador .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2007, 11 (12) :1607-1621
[9]   Robotics in general surgery - Personal experience in a large community hospital [J].
Giulianotti, PC ;
Coratti, A ;
Angelini, M ;
Sbrana, F ;
Cecconi, S ;
Balestracci, T ;
Caravaglios, G .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2003, 138 (07) :777-784
[10]   Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience [J].
Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo ;
Sbrana, Fabio ;
Bianco, Francesco Maria ;
Elli, Enrique Fernando ;
Shah, Galaxy ;
Addeo, Pietro ;
Caravaglios, Giuseppe ;
Coratti, Andrea .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (07) :1646-1657