Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography - A double-blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol

被引:169
作者
Barrett, Brendan J.
Katzberg, Richard W.
Thomsen, Henrik S.
Chen, Nan
Sahani, Dushyant
Soulez, Gilles
Heiken, Jay P.
Lepanto, Luigi
Ni, Zhou-Hui
Nelson, Rendon
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Ctr, Patient Res Ctr, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
[2] Univ Calif, Davis Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Herlev Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Herlev, Denmark
[4] Rui Jin Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[6] CHUM, Dept Radiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[8] Ren Ji Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[9] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
chronic kidney disease; contrast media; contrast-induced nephropathy; computed tomography;
D O I
10.1097/01.rli.0000242807.01818.24
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Based on a single clinical trial, it has been suggested that the contrast agent iodixanol, which is isotonic to human plasma, may be less nephrotoxic than other nonionic contrast agents in renally impaired patients after intra-arterial injection. We compared the effects on renal function of iopamidol-370 injection (796 mOsm/kg) and iodixanol-320 (290 mOsm/kg) in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CE-MDCT) examinations using a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group design. Methods: A total of 166 patients with stable moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (screening and baseline serum creatinine, SCr, >= 1.5 mg/dL and/or creatinine clearance, CrCl, <= 60 mL/min) who were undergoing CE-MDCT of the liver or peripheral arteries were randomized to receive equi-iodine IV doses (40 gI) of either iopamidol-370 (370 mgI/mL) or iodixanol-320 (320 mgI/mL) at 4 mL/s. SCr and CrCl were obtained at screening, baseline, and at 48-72 +/- 6 hours after dose (mean, 57.4 hours). Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) was defined as an absolute increase >= 0.5 mg/dL (44.2 mu mol/L) and/or a relative increase in SCr >= 25% from baseline. Results: A total of 153 patients were included in the final analysis (13 patients excluded because of lack of follow-up, hemodialysis to remove contrast, average daily CrCl variation > 1% at screening). The 2 study groups were comparable with regard to age, gender distribution, the presence of diabetes, concomitant medications, hydration, and contrast dose. Mean predose SCr was 1.6 +/- 0.4 mg/dL in both groups (P = 0.9). An absolute increase >= 0.5 mg/dL (44.2 mu mol/L) in SCr was observed in none of the patients receiving iopamidol-370 and in 2.6% (2/76) of patients receiving iodixanol-320 (95% confidence interval -6.2, 1.0, P = 0.2). A relative increase >= 25% in SCr occurred in 4% (3/77) of patients receiving iopamidol-370 and in 4% (3/76) of the patients receiving iodixanol-320 (95% confidence interval -6.2, 6.1, P = 1.0). Conclusion: The rate of CIN was similarly low in risk patients after intravenous administration of iopamidol-370 or iodixanol-320 for CE-MDCT.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 821
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
Garcia-Ruiz C, 2004, CLIN NEPHROL, V61, P170
[22]   Oral acetylcysteine as an adjunct to saline hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy following coronary angiography - A randomized controlled trial and review of the current literature [J].
Goldenberg, I ;
Shechter, M ;
Matetzky, S ;
Jonas, M ;
Adam, M ;
Pres, H ;
Elian, D ;
Agranat, O ;
Schwammenthal, E ;
Guetta, V .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (03) :212-218
[23]  
Hans SS, 1998, AM SURGEON, V64, P432
[24]   FAILURE TO DEMONSTRATE CONTRAST NEPHROTOXICITY [J].
HELLER, CA ;
KNAPP, J ;
HALLIDAY, J ;
OCONNELL, D ;
HELLER, RF .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1991, 155 (05) :329-332
[25]   Effectiveness of theophylline prophylaxis of renal impairment after coronary angiography in patients with chronic renal insufficiency [J].
Huber, W ;
Schipek, C ;
Ilgmann, K ;
Page, M ;
Hennig, M ;
Wacker, A ;
Schweigart, U ;
Lutilsky, L ;
Valina, C ;
Seyfarth, M ;
Schömg, A ;
Classen, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (10) :1157-1162
[26]   Acetylcysteine for prevention of acute deterioration of renal function following elective coronary angiography and intervention - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Kay, J ;
Chow, WH ;
Chan, TM ;
Lo, SK ;
Kwok, OH ;
Yip, A ;
Fan, K ;
Lee, CH ;
Lam, WF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (05) :553-558
[27]  
KOLEHMAINEN H, 2003, EUR RADIOL, V13, pB32
[28]   Contrast media nephropathy: Intravenous CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in renal artery stenosis: A prospective randomized trial [J].
Lufft, V ;
Hoogestraat-Lufft, L ;
Fels, LM ;
Egbeyong-Baiyee, D ;
Tusch, G ;
Galanski, M ;
Olbricht, CJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 40 (02) :236-242
[29]   The prevention of radiocontrast-agent-induced nephropathy by hemofiltration [J].
Marenzi, G ;
Marana, I ;
Lauri, G ;
Assanelli, E ;
Grazi, M ;
Campodonico, J ;
Trabattoni, D ;
Fabbiocchi, F ;
Montorsi, P ;
Bartorelli, AL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (14) :1333-1340
[30]  
McCullough Peter A, 2003, Rev Cardiovasc Med, V4 Suppl 7, pS3