COVID-19 mitigation measures and nitrogen dioxide-A quasi-experimental study of air quality in Munich, Germany

被引:16
作者
Burns, Jacob [1 ,3 ]
Hoffmann, Sabine [1 ,3 ]
Kurz, Christoph [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Laxy, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Polus, Stephanie [1 ,3 ]
Rehfuess, Eva [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Med Informat Proc Biometry & Epidemiol IBE, Marchioninistr 17, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, Inst Hlth Econ & Hlth Care Management, German Res Ctr Environm Hlth GmbH, Munich, Germany
[3] Pettenkofer Sch Publ Hlth, Munich, Germany
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich Sch Management, Munich, Germany
[5] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich Ctr Hlth Sci, Munich, Germany
关键词
Accountability; Quasi-experimental study; Nitrogen dioxide; Air quality; COVID-19; PARTICULATE MATTER; STRIKE; IMPACT; ACCOUNTABILITY; INTERVENTION; POLLUTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118089
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bavarian State government announced several COVID19 mitigation measures beginning on March 16, 2020, which likely led to a reduction in traffic and a subsequent improvement in air quality. In this study, we evaluated the short-term effect of COVID-19 mitigation measures on NO2 concentrations in Munich, Germany. Methods: We applied two quasi-experimental approaches, a controlled interrupted time-series (c-ITS) approach and a synthetic control (SC) approach. Each approach compared changes occurring in 2020 to changes occurring in 2014-2019, and accounted for weather-related and other potential confounders. We hypothesized that the largest reductions in NO2 concentrations would be observed at traffic sites, with smaller reductions at urban background sites, and even small reductions, if any, at background sites. All hypotheses, as well as the main and additional analyses were defined a priori. We also conducted post-hoc analyses to ensure that observed effects were not due to factors other than the intervention. Results: Main analyses largely supported our hypotheses. Specifically, at the two traffic sites, using the c-ITS approach we observed reductions of 9.34 mu g/m(3) (95% confidence interval:-23.58; 4.90) and 10.02 mu g/m(3) (-19.25;-0.79). Using the SC approach we observed reductions of 15.65 mu g/m(3) (-27.58;-4.09) and 15.1 mu g/ m(3) (-24.82;-9.83) at these same sites. We observed effects ranging from smaller in magnitude to no effect at urban background and background sites. Additional analyses showed that the effect was largest in the first two weeks following introduction of measures, and that a 3-day lagged intervention time also showed a larger effect. Post-hoc analyses suggested that at least some of the observed effects may have been attributable to changes in air quality occurring before the intervention, as well as unusually high concentrations in January 2020. Conclusion: We applied two quasi-experimental approaches in assessing the impact of the COVID-19 mitigation measures on NO2 concentrations in Munich. Taking the 2020 pre-intervention average concentrations as a reference, we observed reductions in NO2 concentrations of approximately 15-25% and 24-36% at traffic sites, suggesting that reducing traffic may be an effective measure to reduce NO2 concentrations in heavily trafficked areas by margins which could translate to public health benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Apple Maps, 2020, MOB TRENDS REP
[2]  
Bayern L., 2020, LUFTHYGIENISCHES LAN
[3]   Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial [J].
Bernal, James Lopez ;
Cummins, Steven ;
Gasparrini, Antonio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (01) :348-355
[4]   The use of controls in interrupted time series studies of public health interventions [J].
Bernal, James Lopez ;
Cummins, Steven ;
Gasparrini, Antonio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (06) :2082-2093
[5]   Accountability Studies on Air Pollution and Health: the HEI Experience [J].
Boogaard H. ;
van Erp A.M. ;
Walker K.D. ;
Shaikh R. .
Current Environmental Health Reports, 2017, 4 (4) :514-522
[6]   Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions [J].
Bouttell, Janet ;
Craig, Peter ;
Lewsey, James ;
Robinson, Mark ;
Popham, Frank .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2018, 72 (08) :673-678
[7]   Effect of road blockages on local air pollution during the Hong Kong protests and its implications for air quality management [J].
Brimblecombe, Peter ;
Ning, Zhi .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 536 :443-448
[8]   Interventions to reduce ambient air pollution and their effects on health: An abridged Cochrane systematic review [J].
Burns, J. ;
Boogaard, H. ;
Polus, S. ;
Pfadenhauer, L. M. ;
Rohwer, A. C. ;
van Erp, A. M. ;
Turley, R. ;
Rehfuess, E. A. .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 135
[9]   Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research [J].
Craig, Peter ;
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ;
Leyland, Alastair ;
Popham, Frank .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 38, 2017, 38 :39-56
[10]   The impact of COVID-19 partial lockdown on the air quality of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [J].
Dantas, Guilherme ;
Siciliano, Bruno ;
Franca, Bruno Boscaro ;
da Silva, Cleyton M. ;
Arbilla, Graciela .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 729