Aggress to Impress: Hostility as an Evolved Context-Dependent Strategy

被引:223
作者
Griskevicius, Vladas [1 ]
Tybur, Joshua M. [2 ]
Gangestad, Steven W. [2 ]
Perea, Elaine F. [3 ]
Shapiro, Jenessa R. [4 ]
Kenrick, Douglas T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Mkt, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Psychol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
sexual selection; aggression; status competition; sex differences; mating strategies; SEX-DIFFERENCES; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; PARENTAL INVESTMENT; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE; MATE PREFERENCES; ROMANTIC MOTIVES; EVOLUTION; CULTURE; SELECTION; VIOLENCE;
D O I
10.1037/a0013907
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Given the high costs of aggression, why have people evolved to act aggressively? Comparative biologists have frequently observed links between aggression, status, and mating in nonhuman animals. In this series of experiments, the authors examined the effects of status, competition, and mating motives on men's and women's aggression. For men, status motives increased direct aggression (face-to-face confrontation). Men's aggression was also boosted by mating motives, but only when observers were other men. For women, both status and mating motives increased indirect aggression (e.g., socially excluding the perpetrator). Although neither status nor mating motives increased women's direct aggression, women did become more directly aggressive when motivated to compete for scarce resources. These context- and sex-specific effects on human aggression contribute to a broader understanding of the functional nature of aggressive behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 994
页数:15
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] They all look the same to me (unless they're angry) - From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity
    Ackerman, Joshua M.
    Shapiro, Jenessa R.
    Neuberg, Steven L.
    Kenrick, Douglas T.
    Becker, D. Vaughn
    Griskevicius, Vladas
    Maner, Jon K.
    Schaller, Mark
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (10) : 836 - 840
  • [2] Andersson Malte, 1994
  • [3] [Anonymous], KUNG SAN MEN WOMEN F
  • [4] An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression
    Archer, J
    Coyne, SM
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2005, 9 (03) : 212 - 230
  • [5] Archer J., 1988, The behavioural biology of aggression.
  • [7] A strategic approach to aggression
    Archer, J
    [J]. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 10 (02) : 267 - 271
  • [8] ARCHER J, 2005, ORIGINS AGGRESSION, P425
  • [9] Berkowitz L., 1993, AGGRESSION
  • [10] Betzig L.L., 1986, Despotism and differential reproduction: A Darwinian view of history