Steady state H mode and Te ≈ Ti operation with internal transport barriers in ASDEX Upgrade

被引:30
作者
Gruber, O [1 ]
Wolf, R
Bosch, HS
Dux, R
Günther, S
McCarthy, PJ
Lackner, K
Maraschek, M
Meister, H
Pereverzev, G
Stäbler, A
Treutterer, W
机构
[1] EURATOM, Max Planck Inst Plasmaphys, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Univ Coll Cork, Assoc Euratom DCU, Cork, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0029-5515/40/6/312
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
A review is presented of the scenarios and physics of advanced tokamak discharges and the associated technical enhancements leading towards enhanced performance and steady state operation in ASDEX Upgrade. A stationary advanced tokamak scenario with internal transport barriers (ITBs) in combination with an H mode barrier and weak shear (q(min) approximate to 1) was maintained for 40 confinement times and several internal skin times with H(ITERL-89P)beta(N) approximate to 5. By raising the triangularity of the plasma shape the performance was increased up to H(ITERL-89P)beta(N) approximate to 7.2, but beta is still limited by neoclassical tearing modes. The density was raised to close to 50% of the Greenwald density either by edge gas fuelling, causing an increase of the threshold power to sustain an ITB and a decrease of Z(eff) below 2, or by improved core particle confinement with more triangular plasma shapes without changing the ITB onset conditions. Sufficient helium pumping and no temporal impurity accumulation was observed despite peaked impurity density profiles. MHD modes contribute to making the shear profile stationary. In the ITB/H mode scenario (1,1) fishbones clamp the q value to the vicinity of 1 and avoid sawteeth, while in ITB scenarios with reversed shear (q(min) approximate to 2) (2,1) fishbones can clamp the current profile development near the q = 2 surface without; causing energy confinement to deteriorate. Double tearing modes act similarly, but lead to substantial confinement losses. Applying central ECRF heating and current drive to beam heated reversed shear ITB discharges shows a substantial effect on MHD stability, affecting the passage of the q profile through q(min) = 2 and degrading or prolonging the reversed shear phase, depending on the current drive direction. Moreover, reactor relevant T-e approximate to T-i operation with temperatures in excess of 10 keV was achieved with internal transport barriers for both electrons and ions simultaneously. For current profile control ECCD will be supplemented by on-axis fast wave ICCD and off-axis current drive up to 400 kA using NBI (available in 2001) and ICRF mode conversion. Stationary discharges with reversed shear and q(min) > 2 should then be possible at a plasma current of 1 MA according to power deposition, current drive and transport calculations.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1155
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Noble gas exhaust with a strongly baffled divertor in ASDEX-Upgrade
    Bosch, HS
    Ullrich, W
    Bard, A
    Coster, D
    Haas, G
    Kallenbach, A
    Neuhauser, J
    Schneider, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 1999, 266 : 462 - 466
  • [2] DUX R, 1999, CONTROLLED FUSION J, V23, P1409
  • [3] Internal transport barrier for electrons in JT-60U reversed shear discharges
    Fujita, T
    Ide, S
    Shirai, H
    Kikuchi, M
    Naito, O
    Koide, Y
    Takeji, S
    Kubo, H
    Ishida, S
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1997, 78 (12) : 2377 - 2380
  • [4] Stationary H-mode discharges with internal transport barrier on ASDEX upgrade
    Gruber, O
    Wolf, RC
    Dux, R
    Fuchs, C
    Günter, S
    Kallenbach, A
    Lackner, K
    Maraschek, M
    McCarthy, PJ
    Meister, H
    Pereversev, G
    Ryter, F
    Schweinzer, J
    Seidel, U
    Sesnic, S
    Stäbler, A
    Stober, J
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1999, 83 (09) : 1787 - 1790
  • [5] Overview of ASDEX Upgrade results
    Gruber, O
    Bosch, HS
    Günter, S
    Herrmann, A
    Kallenbach, A
    Kaufmann, M
    Krieger, K
    Lackner, K
    Mertens, V
    Neu, R
    Ryter, F
    Schweinzer, J
    Stäbler, A
    Suttrop, W
    Wolf, R
    Asmussen, K
    Bard, A
    Becker, G
    Behler, K
    Behringer, K
    Bergmann, A
    Bessenrodt-Weberpals, M
    Borrass, K
    Braams, B
    Brambilla, M
    Brandenburg, R
    Braun, F
    Brinkschulte, H
    Brückner, R
    Brüsehaber, B
    Büchl, K
    Buhler, A
    Callaghan, HP
    Carlson, A
    Coster, DP
    Cupido, L
    Hempel, SD
    Dorn, C
    Drube, R
    Dux, R
    Egorov, S
    Engelhardt, W
    Fahrbach, HU
    Fantz, U
    Feist, HU
    Franzen, P
    Fuchs, JC
    Fussmann, G
    Gafert, J
    Gantenbein, G
    [J]. NUCLEAR FUSION, 1999, 39 (9Y) : 1321 - 1336
  • [6] Günter S, 1999, PLASMA PHYS CONTR F, V41, pB231, DOI 10.1088/0741-3335/41/12B/317
  • [7] GUNTER S, IN PRESS PHYS REV LE
  • [8] GUNTER S, IN PRESS NUCL FUSION
  • [9] IMPROVED CONFINEMENT WITH REVERSED MAGNETIC SHEAR IN TFTR
    LEVINTON, FM
    ZARNSTORFF, MC
    BATHA, SH
    BELL, M
    BELL, RE
    BUDNY, RV
    BUSH, C
    CHANG, Z
    FREDRICKSON, E
    JANOS, A
    MANICKAM, J
    RAMSEY, A
    SABBAGH, SA
    SCHMIDT, GL
    SYNAKOWSKI, EJ
    TAYLOR, G
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1995, 75 (24) : 4417 - 4420
  • [10] PEREVERZEV G, 1998, CONTROLLED FUSION C, V22, P496