Slow event-related brain activity of aphasic patients and controls in word comprehension and rhyming tasks

被引:10
作者
Dobel, C
Cohen, R
Berg, P
Nagl, W
Zobel, E
Köbbel, P
Schönle, PW
Rockstroh, B
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Konstanz, Dept Psychol, Constance, Germany
[3] Schmiedar Rehabil Hosp, Lurija Inst Rehabil & Hlth Res, Allensbach, Germany
关键词
aphasia; event-related potentials; phonological encoding; lexical access; rhyming; language production;
D O I
10.1111/1469-8986.3960747
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Slow event-related potentials (ERP) were examined in healthy and aphasic Subjects in two-stimulus designs comprising a word comprehension and a rhyming task. Aphasics. though selected to perform above chance level. made significantly more errors and responded more slowly than controls, although canonical correlations did not indicate a statistical relationship between performance measures and ERP amplitudes. A discriminant analysis of ERP amplitudes distinguished the groups for the slow wave (SW: 0.5-1.0 s post-S1 onset) in the word comprehension, for the SW and the initial contingent negative variation (iCNV: 1.0-2.0 s post-S1 onset) in the rhyming task. Similarly for both tasks. ERP topography showed left-anterior predominance of the negative SW and iCNV in controls, whereas participants with aphasia showed smaller anterior and larger left-posterior amplitudes. The centroparietal terminal CNV (tCNV: 1 s pre-S2) was smaller in participants with aphasia than in controls. but similar in topography. Results suggest left-anterior activation for those language processes that were presumably provoked in the present tasks, like lexical access, or phonological encoding. The pattern of participants with aphasia may indicate effects of language impairment and recovery. but also consequences of the brain damage.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 758
页数:12
相关论文
共 81 条
[51]   CORTICAL LANGUAGE LOCALIZATION IN LEFT, DOMINANT HEMISPHERE - AN ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION MAPPING INVESTIGATION IN 117 PATIENTS [J].
OJEMANN, G ;
OJEMANN, J ;
LETTICH, E ;
BERGER, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 71 (03) :316-326
[53]   THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS: THE EDINBURGH INVENTORY [J].
OLDFIELD, RC .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1971, 9 (01) :97-113
[54]   Brain potentials elicited by words: word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity [J].
Osterhout, L ;
Bersick, M ;
McKinnon, R .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 46 (02) :143-168
[55]   EVOKED-POTENTIAL CORRELATES OF RIGHT-HEMISPHERE INVOLVEMENT IN LANGUAGE RECOVERY FOLLOWING STROKE [J].
PAPANICOLAOU, AC ;
MOORE, BD ;
LEVIN, HS ;
EISENBERG, HM .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1987, 44 (05) :521-524
[56]  
Picton T. W., 1995, HDB NEUROPSYCHOL, V10, P3
[57]   The contribution of functional neuroimaging to recovery after brain damage: A review [J].
Pizzamiglio, L ;
Galati, G ;
Committeri, G .
CORTEX, 2001, 37 (01) :11-31
[58]   Words in the brain's language [J].
Pulvermüller, F .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1999, 22 (02) :253-+
[59]   Hebb's concept of cell assemblies and the psychophysiology of word processing [J].
Pulvermuller, F .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 33 (04) :317-333
[60]   RHYMING AND THE RIGHT-HEMISPHERE [J].
RAYMAN, J ;
ZAIDEL, E .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1991, 40 (01) :89-105