Cardiac Outcomes After Screening for Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes The DIAD Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:593
作者
Young, Lawrence H. [1 ]
Wackers, Frans J. Th. [1 ]
Chyun, Deborah A. [3 ]
Davey, Janice A. [1 ]
Barrett, Eugene J. [4 ]
Taillefer, Raymond [5 ]
Heller, Gary V. [6 ]
Iskandrian, Ami E. [7 ]
Wittlin, Steven D. [8 ]
Filipchuk, Neil [9 ]
Ratner, Robert E. [10 ]
Inzucchi, Silvio E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Endocrinol Sect, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] NYU, Coll Dent, Coll Nursing, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Dept Endocrinol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[5] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Hartford Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Hartford, CT 06115 USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Cardiol, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Univ Rochester, Dept Endocrinol, Rochester, NY USA
[9] Cardiol Consultants, Calgary, AB, Canada
[10] MedStar Res Inst, Washington, DC USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2009年 / 301卷 / 15期
关键词
EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SILENT-MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; RISK STRATIFICATION; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; HEART-DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; PREVALENCE; MORTALITY; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2009.476
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. But the utility of screening patients with type 2 diabetes for asymptomatic CAD is controversial. Objective To assess whether routine screening for CAD identifies patients with type 2 diabetes as being at high cardiac risk and whether it affects their cardiac outcomes. Design, Setting, and Patients The Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics (DIAD) study is a randomized controlled trial in which 1123 participants with type 2 diabetes and no symptoms of CAD were randomly assigned to be screened with adenosine-stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) or not to be screened. Participants were recruited from diabetes clinics and practices and prospectively followed up from August 2000 to September 2007. Main Outcome Measure Cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). Results The cumulative cardiac event rate was 2.9% over a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.8 (0.9) years for an average of 0.6% per year. Seven nonfatal MIs and 8 cardiac deaths (2.7%) occurred among the screened group and 10 nonfatal MIs and 7 cardiac deaths (3.0%) among the not-screened group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.88; P=.73). Of those in the screened group, 409 participants with normal results and 50 with small MPI defects had lower event rates than the 33 with moderate or large MPI defects; 0.4% per year vs 2.4% per year (HR, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.9-20.1; P=.001). Nevertheless, the positive predictive value of having moderate or large MPI defects was only 12%. The overall rate of coronary revascularization was low in both groups: 31 (5.5%) in the screened group and 44 (7.8%) in the unscreened group (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-1.1; P=.14). During the course of study there was a significant and equivalent increase in primary medical prevention in both groups. Conclusion In this contemporary study population of patients with diabetes, the cardiac event rates were low and were not significantly reduced by MPI screening for myocardial ischemia over 4.8 years. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00769275
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1555
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction [J].
Haffner, SM ;
Lehto, S ;
Rönnemaa, T ;
Pyörälä, K ;
Laakso, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (04) :229-234
[22]   Diabetes, glucose level, and risk of sudden cardiac death [J].
Jouven, X ;
Lemaître, RN ;
Rea, TD ;
Sotoodehnia, N ;
Empana, JP ;
Siscovick, DS .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (20) :2142-2147
[23]   Use of stress echocardiography to predict mortality in patients with diabetes and known or suspected coronary artery disease [J].
Marwick, TH ;
Case, C ;
Sawada, S ;
Vasey, C ;
Short, L ;
Lauer, M .
DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (06) :1042-1048
[24]   Screening asymptomatic diabetic patients for coronary artery disease - Why not? [J].
Miller, Todd D. ;
Redberg, Rita F. ;
Wackers, Frans J. T. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 48 (04) :761-764
[25]   Use of dobutamine stress echocardiography in detecting silent myocardial ischaemia in asymptomatic diabetic patients: a comparison with thallium scintigraphy and exercise testing [J].
Penfornis, A ;
Zimmermann, C ;
Boumal, D ;
Sabbaht, A ;
Meneveau, N ;
Gaultier-Bourgeois, S ;
Bassand, JP ;
Bernard, Y .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2001, 18 (11) :900-905
[26]   Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in subjects with and without diabetes [J].
Raggi, P ;
Shaw, LJ ;
Berman, DS ;
Callister, TQ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (09) :1663-1669
[27]   Identifying high-risk asymptomatic diabetic patients who are candidates for screening stress single-photon emission computed tomography imaging [J].
Rajagopalan, N ;
Miller, TD ;
Hodge, DO ;
Frye, RL ;
Gibbons, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (01) :43-49
[28]   Achievement of American Diabetes Association clinical practice recommendations among US adults with diabetes, 1999-2002 - The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [J].
Resnick, HE ;
Foster, GL ;
Bardsley, J ;
Ratner, RE .
DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (03) :531-537
[29]   The changing costs and benefits of screening for asymptomatic coronary heart disease in patients with diabetes [J].
Rutter, Martin K. ;
Nesto, Richard W. .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2007, 3 (01) :26-35
[30]   Improved survival in asymptomatic diabetic patients with high-risk Spect imaging treated with coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
Sorajja, P ;
Chareonthaitawee, P ;
Rajagopalan, N ;
Miller, TD ;
Frye, RL ;
Hodge, DO ;
Gibbons, RJ .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (09) :I311-I316