Accuracy of a freehand sculpting tool for unicondylar knee replacement

被引:29
作者
Smith, Julie R. [1 ]
Riches, Philip E. [1 ]
Rowe, Philip J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Biomed Engn, Ctr Robot Orthopaed Surg Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0NW, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
unicompartmental knee replacement; robotic assistive device; accuracy validation; ARTHROPLASTY; NAVIGATION; SURGERY; SYSTEM; 5-YEAR; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.1522
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundUnicondylar knee replacement is technically challenging and malalignment of the implant components is one of the factors that results in high failure rates. Surgical robotics with navigation is emerging as a potential solution to improve the accuracy of implant placement. MethodsThe accuracy of performing unicondylar knee replacement using a freehand sculpting, semi-active robotic tool was investigated using 20 synthetic femurs and tibia. Resultant femoral and tibial implant placement was compared to the planned implant position. ResultsThe maximum rotational error was 3.2o and RMS angular error was 1.46o across all orientations, for both the tibia and femoral implants. The maximum translational error was 1.18mm and the RMS translational error across all directions was 0.61mm. ConclusionsThe freehand sculpting tool produced accurate implant placement with small errors comparable to those reported by other robotic-assistive devices on the market for unicondylar knee replacement. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 169
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement [J].
Baker, P. N. ;
Petheram, T. ;
Jameson, S. S. ;
Avery, P. J. ;
Reed, M. R. ;
Gregg, P. J. ;
Deehan, D. J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (07) :919-927
[2]  
Bargar WL, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P82
[3]   Alignment in total knee arthroplasty -: A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique [J].
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Tingart, M ;
Lüring, C ;
Zurakowski, D ;
Grifka, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (05) :682-687
[4]  
Brisson G, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3217, P105
[5]   Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique -: A randomised, prospective trial [J].
Chauhan, SK ;
Scott, RG ;
Breidahl, W ;
Beaver, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (03) :372-377
[6]   Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement - A prospective, randomised controlled study of the Acrobot system [J].
Cobb, J ;
Henckel, J ;
Gomes, P ;
Harris, S ;
Jakopec, M ;
Rodriguez y Baena, F ;
Barrett, A ;
Davies, B .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (02) :188-197
[7]  
DiGioia AM, 2010, ORTHOP TODAY FEB
[8]  
Dundar NJ, 2012, J ARTHROPLASTY, V27, P803
[9]   Function and quality of life following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age or younger [J].
Felts, E. ;
Parratte, S. ;
Pauly, V. ;
Aubaniac, J-M ;
Argenson, J-N .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2010, 96 (08) :861-867
[10]   A 5-YEAR TO 7-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF UNICONDYLAR ARTHROPLASTY [J].
INSALL, J ;
AGLIETTI, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1980, 62 (08) :1329-1337