Utilization of standardized patients to evaluate clinical and interpersonal skills of surgical residents

被引:32
作者
Hassett, Jarnes M.
Zinnerstrom, Karen
Nawotniak, Ruth H.
Schimpfhauser, Frank
Dayton, Merril T.
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Buffalo, NY 14203 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Clin Competence Ctr, Buffalo, NY 14203 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. This project was designed to determine the growth of interpersonal skills during the first year of a surgical residency. Methods. All categorical surgical residents were given a clinical skills examination of abdominal pain using standardized patients during their orientation (T1). The categorical residents were retested after 11 months (T2). The assessment tool was based on a 12-item modified version of the 5-point Likert Interpersonal Scale (IP) used on the National Board of Medical, Examiners prototype Clinical Skills Examination and a 24-item, done-or-not-done, history-taking checklist. Residents' self-evaluation scores were compared to standardized patients' assessment scores. Data were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient,. Wilcoxon signed rank test, Student t test, and Cronbach alpha. Results. Thirty-eight categorical residents were evaluated at TI and T2. At T1, in the history-taking exercise, the scores of the standardized patients and residents correlated (Pearson =.5415 P =. 000). In the interpersonal skills exercise, the scores of the standardized patients and residents did not correlate (Pearson = -0. 238, P =.150). At T2, there was a significant improvement in the residents' self-evaluation scores in both the history-taking exercise (t = -3.280, P =.002) and the interpersonal skills exercise (t = 2.506, P = 0. 017). In the history-taking exercise, the standardized patients' assessment scores correlated with the residents' se self-evaluation scores (Pearson = 0. 5615 P =. 000). In the interpersonal skills exercise, the standardized patients' assessment scores did not correlate with the residents' self-evaluation scores (Pearson = 0.0785 P =.646). Conclusions. Surgical residents demonstrate a consistently low level of self-awareness regarding their interpersonal skills. Observed improvement in resident self-evaluation may be a function of growth in self-confidence.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 638
页数:6
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   Assessment of residents' interpersonal skills by faculty proctors and standardized patients: A psychometric analysis [J].
Donnelly, MB ;
Sloan, D ;
Plymale, M ;
Schwartz, R .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (10) :S93-S95
[2]   A survey of physician training programs in risk management and communication skills for malpractice prevention [J].
Lefevre, F ;
Waters, TM ;
Budetti, PP .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2000, 28 (03) :258-+
[3]   Evaluating the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education core clinical competencies: Techniques and feasibility in a urology training program [J].
Miller, DC ;
Montie, JE ;
Faerber, GJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (04) :1312-1317
[4]   Becoming a physician - The step 2 clinical-skills examination. [J].
Papadakis, MA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (17) :1703-1705
[5]   Using standardized patients to assess medical students' professionalism [J].
Prislin, MD ;
Lie, D ;
Shapiro, J ;
Boker, J ;
Radecki, S .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2001, 76 (10) :S90-S92
[6]   Interpreting the judgment of surgical faculty regarding resident competence [J].
Warf, BC ;
Donnelly, MB ;
Schwartz, RW ;
Sloan, DA .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 86 (01) :29-35