Efficacy and tolerability of eperisone and baclofen in spastic palsy: a double-blind randomized trial

被引:17
作者
Bresolin, N. [1 ]
Zucca, C. [2 ]
Pecori, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Inst Clin Neurol, IRCCS Osped Maggiore Policlin, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS E Medea, Neurophysiopathol Unit, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy
[3] Eisai Srl, Dept Med, San Donato Milanese, Italy
关键词
baclofen; central muscle relaxants; double-blind; eperisone; randomized; spastic palsy; LOW-BACK-PAIN; INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN; MUSCLE-RELAXANT; EXPERIENCE; TIZANIDINE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-009-0031-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学]; 100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
Few trials have compared different central muscle relaxants in the treatment of spastic palsy. This head-to-head phase 3 trial compares oral eperisone, a central muscle relaxant with a promising activity in spasticity therapy, and oral baclofen. Patients (> 18 years) with moderate to severe spastic palsy were eligible in this double-blind, randomized study; they received eperisone 300 mg/ day or baclofen 60 mg/day for 6 weeks. The efficacy evaluations included: functional analysis (Pedersen's scale, muscular tone, joint range of motion, 10-meter walking time); physiological and pathological reflexes; and electromyography (Hmax/Mmax amplitude ratio and the Wartenberg test). Physicians and patients globally assessed treatment efficacy. Both eperisone (n=40) and baclofen (n=40) significantly improved functionality of lower limbs versus baseline (eperisone: -9.1%, P < 0.01; baclofen: -8.3%, P < 0.05), but only eperisone improved this parameter in the upper limbs (-7.8%, P < 0.01 vs. -6.3%, P=NS). Both drugs reduced muscular tone from week 2. Only eperisone improved the joint range of motion (-32.5%, P < 0.01 vs. -14.6%, P=NS). Both treatments reduced the 10-meter walking time (eperisone: -20.2%, P < 0.01; baclofen: -24.0%, P < 0.01); this effect was evident at week 2 with eperisone only. Both drugs improved reflexes. Eperisone and baclofen decreased the Hmax/Mmax amplitude ratio (eperisone: -30.0%, baclofen: -18.6%; P < 0.01 for both). Eperisone increased the number of leg oscillations at the Wartenberg test (P < 0.05) while baclofen increased the velocity of leg falling (P < 0.01). For tolerability, no differences were observed between eperisone and baclofen in any parameters. Eperisone was judged as "good" by a higher number of physicians and patients than baclofen. Eighteen adverse events, most of mild intensity, were reported with eperisone and 27 with baclofen. Eperisone 300 mg/day and baclofen 60 mg/day, administered orally, are effective and well-tolerated drugs in the treatment of spastic palsy. However, eperisone might be associated with some additional clinical benefits when compared with baclofen.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 573
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
[Anonymous], GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION
[2]
TIZANIDINE VERSUS BACLOFEN IN THE TREATMENT OF SPASTICITY IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
BASS, B ;
WEINSHENKER, B ;
RICE, GPA ;
NOSEWORTHY, JH ;
CAMERON, MGP ;
HADER, W ;
BOUCHARD, S ;
EBERS, GC .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1988, 15 (01) :15-19
[3]
Beltrame A, 2008, Minerva Med, V99, P347
[4]
Spasticity-assessment: a review [J].
Biering-Sorensen, F. ;
Nielsen, J. B. ;
Klinge, K. .
SPINAL CORD, 2006, 44 (12) :708-722
[5]
The efficacy and safety of eperisone in patients with cervical spondylosis: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Bose, K .
METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 21 (03) :209-213
[6]
Intrathecal baclofen therapy for neurological disorders: a sound knowledge base but many challenges remain [J].
Brennan, P. M. ;
Whittle, I. R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 22 (04) :508-519
[7]
BRESOLIN N, 2009, EUR REV MED IN PRESS
[8]
Cabitza P, 2008, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V12, P229
[9]
A benefit-risk assessment of baclofen in severe spinal spasticity [J].
Dario, A ;
Tomei, G .
DRUG SAFETY, 2004, 27 (11) :799-818
[10]
Dones I, 2007, ACTA NEUROCHIR SUPPL, V97, P185