Individual-collective primacy and ingroup favoritism: enhancement and protection effects

被引:44
作者
Chen, YR
Brockner, J
Chen, XP
机构
[1] NYU, Stern Sch Business, Dept Management & Int Business, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, Dept Management, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Management & Org, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00018-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individual-collective primacy refers to the extent to which people emphasize their individual interests (individual-primacy) vs. the interests of their ingroup (collective-primacy). This study examined the interactive effects of individual-collective primacy, ingroup performance, and outgroup performance on ingroup favoritism. Participants from two cultures completed a measure of their individual vs. collective-primacy orientation. Performance feedback (favorable or unfavorable) for themselves, their ingroup, and the outgroup were manipulated orthogonally. As predicted, greater collective-primacy led to more ingroup favoritism when the ingroup performed better or worse than the outgroup. However, when the ingroup and outgroup both performed well or both performed poorly, the relationship between collective-primacy and ingroup favoritism was not significant. Implications for analyses of ingroup favoritism and cross-cultural differences are discussed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 491
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
Ellemers Naomi., 1999, Social Identity Context, Commitment, Content
[12]  
Erez M., 1993, CULTURE SELF IDENTIT
[13]   Perceiving persons and groups [J].
Hamilton, DL ;
Sherman, SJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1996, 103 (02) :336-355
[14]  
Hofstede G., 1980, CULTURAL CONSEQUENCE
[15]  
Janis I.L., 1982, Victims of Groupthink, V2nd
[16]  
LEVINE JM, 1998, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, V2, P315
[17]   Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach [J].
Mackie, DM ;
Smith, ER .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (03) :499-529
[18]  
MACKIE DM, 1987, REV PERSONALITY SOCI, V8, P144
[19]  
Mark HFL, 1999, GENET MED, V1, P98
[20]   INGROUP BIAS AS A FUNCTION OF SALIENCE, RELEVANCE, AND STATUS - AN INTEGRATION [J].
MULLEN, B ;
BROWN, R ;
SMITH, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (02) :103-122