Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services

被引:182
作者
Mastrangelo, Matias E. [1 ]
Weyland, Federico [1 ]
Villarino, Sebastian H. [1 ]
Barral, Maria P. [1 ]
Nahuelhual, Laura [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Laterra, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Mar del Plata, Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Fac Ciencias Agr, CONICET,Unidad Integrada Balcarce EEA Balcarce, Route 226 Km 73-5,CC 276, RA-7620 Balcarce, Argentina
[2] Univ Austral Chile, Inst Econ Agr, Valdivia, Chile
[3] FORECOS, Fdn Ctr Bosques Nat, Valdivia, Chile
[4] Ctr Climate & Resilience Res CR2, Concepcion, Chile
关键词
Landscape services; Spatial scales; Ecosystem functions; Stakeholder participation; Land-sharing; Land-sparing; Landscape planning; Synergy; Ecosystem service relationships; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; RURAL LANDSCAPES; FOOD-PRODUCTION; TRADE-OFFS; STAKEHOLDERS; MODEL; AGRICULTURE; MANAGEMENT; ARGENTINA; SCALES;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-013-9959-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The potential of landscapes to supply multiple benefits to society beyond commodities production has received increasing research and policy attention. Linking the concept of multifunctionality with the ecosystem services (ES) approach offers a promising avenue for producing scientific evidence to inform landscape planning, e. g., about the relative utility of land-sharing and land-sparing. However, the value for decision-making of ES-based multifunctionality assessments has been constrained by a significant conceptual and methodological dispersion. To contribute towards a cohesive framework for landscape multifunctionality, we analyse case studies of joint ES supply regarding ten criteria designed to ultimately answer four aspects: (i) the multifunctionality of what (e. g., landscapes), (ii) the type of multifunctionality (e. g., based on ES synergies), (iii) the procedure of multifunctionality assessments, and (iv) the purpose of multifunctionality. We constructed a typology of methodological approaches based on scores for criteria describing the evaluation method and the level of stakeholder participation in assessments of joint ES supply. Surveyed studies and underlying types of methodological approaches (spatial, socio-spatial, functional, spatio-functional) differed in most criteria. We illustrate the influence of methodological divergence on planning recommendations by comparing two studies employing contrasting approaches (spatial and functional) to assess the joint supply of wildlife habitat and agricultural production in the Argentine Chaco. We distinguish between a pattern-based and process-based multifunctionality, where the latter can only be detected through approaches considering the ecological processes (e. g., ES complementarities) supporting the supply of multiple ES (functional and spatio-functional). Finally, we propose an integrated approach for assessing a socially-relevant process-based multifunctionality.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 358
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Multifunctional dimensions of ecologically-based agriculture in Latin America [J].
Altieri, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2000, 7 (01) :62-75
[2]   Biofuels on the landscape: Is "land sharing" preferable to "land sparing"? [J].
Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina J. ;
Duval, Benjamin D. ;
Long, Stephen P. ;
DeLucia, Evan H. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2012, 22 (08) :2035-2048
[3]  
Angelsen A., 2001, AGR TECHNOLOGIES TRO
[4]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[5]   Pollination services decline with distance from natural habitat even in biodiversity-rich areas [J].
Carvalheiro, Luisa G. ;
Seymour, Colleen L. ;
Veldtman, Ruan ;
Nicolson, Susan W. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2010, 47 (04) :810-820
[6]   Effects of Landscape Segregation on Livelihood Vulnerability: Moving From Extensive Shifting Cultivation to Rotational Agriculture and Natural Forests in Northern Laos [J].
Castella, Jean-Christophe ;
Lestrelin, Guillaume ;
Hett, Cornelia ;
Bourgoin, Jeremy ;
Fitriana, Yulia Rahma ;
Heinimann, Andreas ;
Pfund, Jean-Laurent .
HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2013, 41 (01) :63-76
[7]   Conservation planning for ecosystem services [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Shaw, M. Rebecca ;
Cameron, David R. ;
Underwood, Emma C. ;
Daily, Gretchen C. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (11) :2138-2152
[8]   An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation [J].
Cowling, Richard M. ;
Egoh, Benis ;
Knight, Andrew T. ;
O'Farrell, Patrick J. ;
Reyers, Belinda ;
Rouget'll, Mathieu ;
Roux, Dirk J. ;
Welz, Adam ;
Wilhelm-Rechman, Angelika .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) :9483-9488
[9]   Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality [J].
Crossman, Neville D. ;
Bryan, Brett A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (03) :654-668
[10]   Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making [J].
de Groot, R. S. ;
Alkemade, R. ;
Braat, L. ;
Hein, L. ;
Willemen, L. .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) :260-272