Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for monitored anaesthesia care during cataract surgery

被引:115
作者
Alhashemi, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, King Abdulaziz Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Jeddah 21413, Saudi Arabia
关键词
recovery; sedation; dexmedetomidine; midazolam; monitored anaesthesia care; surgery; ophthalmological;
D O I
10.1093/bja/ael080
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Cataract surgery is commonly performed under local anaesthesia with midazolam sedation. Dexmedetomidine, a sedative-analgesic, is devoid of respiratory depressant effects, and its use in cataract surgery has not been reported. This double-blind study compared the use of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Methods. Forty-four patients undergoing cataract surgery under peribulbar anaesthesia randomly received either i.v. dexmedetomidine 1 mu g kg(-1) over 10 min; followed by 0.1-0.7 mu g kg(-1) h(-1) i.v. infusion (Group D), or midazolam 20 mu g kg(-1) i.v.; followed by 0.5 mg i.v. boluses as required (Group M). Sedation was titrated to a Ramsay sedation score of 3. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), readiness for recovery room discharge (time to Aldrete score of 10), and patients' and surgeons' satisfaction (on a scale of 1-7) were determined. Results: Map and HR were in Gruop D compared Group M [86 (se 3) vs 102 (3) mm Hg and 65 (2) vs 72 (2) beats min(-1), respectively] (P < 0.05). Group D patients had slightly higher satisfaction with sedation [median (IQR): 6 (6-7) vs 6 (5-7), P < 0.05], but delayed readiness for discharge [45 (36-54) vs 21 (10-32) min, P < 0.01] compared with patients in Group M. Surgeons' satisfaction was comparable in both groups [5 (4-6) vs 5 (4-6)]. Conclusion. Compared with midazolam, dexmedetomidine does not appear to be suitable for sedation in patients undergoing cataract surgery. While there was a slightly better subjective patient satisfaction, it was accompanied by relative cardiovascular depression and delayed recovery room discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 726
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   Effectiveness of oxygenation and suction in cataract surgery:: is suction of CO2-enriched air under the drape during cataract surgery necessary? [J].
Inan, ÜÜ ;
Sivaci, RG ;
Öztürk, F .
EYE, 2003, 17 (01) :74-78
[12]   Patient-controlled sedation using propofol in elderly patients in day-case cataract surgery [J].
Janzen, PRM ;
Christys, A ;
Vucevic, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (04) :635-636
[13]   Cardiovascular responses, arterial oxygen saturation and plasma catecholamine concentration during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using conscious sedation with midazolam or propofol [J].
Oei-Lim, VLB ;
Kalkman, CJ ;
Bartelsman, JFWM ;
Res, JCJ ;
van Wezel, HB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (05) :535-543
[14]   CONTROLLED SEDATION WITH ALPHAXALONE-ALPHADOLONE [J].
RAMSAY, MAE ;
SAVEGE, TM ;
SIMPSON, BRJ ;
GOODWIN, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1974, 2 (5920) :656-659
[15]   Oxygenation of patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery under local anaesthesia [J].
Risdall, JE ;
Geraghty, IF .
ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (05) :492-495
[16]   INTRAVENOUS SEDATION FOR OCULAR SURGERY UNDER LOCAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
SALMON, JF ;
METS, B ;
JAMES, MFM ;
MURRAY, ADN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 76 (10) :598-601
[17]   PHARMACODYNAMICS AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF INTRAMUSCULAR DEXMEDETOMIDINE [J].
SCHEININ, H ;
KARHUVAARA, S ;
OLKKOLA, KT ;
KALLIO, A ;
ANTTILA, M ;
VUORILEHTO, L ;
SCHEININ, M .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1992, 52 (05) :537-546
[18]   Oxygen application by a nasal probe prevents hypoxia but not rebreathing of carbon dioxide in patients undergoing eye surgery under local anaesthesia [J].
Schlager, A ;
Luger, TJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 84 (04) :399-402
[19]  
Streiner D.L., 1995, Health measurement scales
[20]   DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS INTRAMUSCULAR PREMEDICATION FOR DAY-CASE CATARACT-SURGERY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE, MIDAZOLAM AND PLACEBO [J].
VIRKKILA, M ;
ALIMELKKILA, T ;
KANTO, J ;
TURUNEN, J ;
SCHEININ, H .
ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 49 (10) :853-858