Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition

被引:405
作者
Tamm, L
Menon, V
Reiss, AL
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Program Neurosci, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanford Brain Res Ctr, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
development; fMRI; inhibition; Go/NoGo; executive function;
D O I
10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the developmental trajectory of response inhibition and, more specifically, whether there is a dissociation of function in the prefrontal cortex over the course of development of executive function and associated response inhibition abilities. Method: Nineteen typically developing subjects, ranging in age from 8 to 20, performed a Go/NoGo task while behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected. Results: All subjects performed the task with few errors of omission and commission. No relationship between accuracy and age emerged, but the ability to inhibit responses more quickly significantly improved with age. Analyses of fMRI data revealed a positive correlation between activation and age in the left inferior frontal gyrus/insula/orbitofrontal gyrus, and a negative correlation between activation and age in the left middle/superior frontal gyri. Conclusion: These data provide the first evidence of dissociable processes occurring in the prefrontal cortex during development of executive functions associated with response inhibition: (1) Younger subjects activate more extensively than older subjects in discrete regions of the prefrontal cortex, presumably due to increased demands and inefficient recruitment of brain regions subserving executive functions including working memory. (2) Older subjects show increasingly focal activation in specific regions thought to play a more critical role in response inhibition.
引用
收藏
页码:1231 / 1238
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Achenbach T.M., 1991, INTEGRATIVE GUIDE 19
[2]   The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: Separate developmental trends [J].
Band, GPH ;
van der Molen, MW ;
Overtoom, CCE ;
Verbaten, MN .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 75 (04) :263-290
[3]  
Belger A, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P14, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:1<14::AID-HBM2>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-2
[5]   CUE SIGNIFICANCE AND RESPONSE REGULATION IN 3-YEAR-OLD TO 6-YEAR-OLD CHILDRENS LEARNING OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE DISCRIMINATION TASKS [J].
BELL, JA ;
LIVESEY, PJ .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 1985, 18 (03) :229-245
[6]   INSULAR CORTEX AND AMYGDALA LESIONS DIFFERENTIALLY AFFECT ACQUISITION ON INHIBITORY AVOIDANCE AND CONDITIONED TASTE-AVERSION [J].
BERMUDEZRATTONI, F ;
MCGAUGH, JL .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 549 (01) :165-170
[7]   How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study [J].
Blakemore, SJ ;
Rees, G ;
Frith, CD .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1998, 36 (06) :521-529
[8]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[9]   Age related changes in inhibitory control as measured by stop signal task performance [J].
Carver, AC ;
Livesey, DJ ;
Charles, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 107 (1-2) :43-61
[10]   A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a Go-No-Go task [J].
Casey, BJ ;
Trainor, RJ ;
Orendi, JL ;
Schubert, AB ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Giedd, JN ;
Castellanos, FX ;
Haxby, JV ;
Noll, DC ;
Cohen, JD ;
Forman, SD ;
Dahl, RE ;
Rapoport, JL .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (06) :835-847