Equity in climate-economy scenarios: the importance of subnational income distribution

被引:9
作者
Baer, Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] EcoEquity, Albany, CA 94706 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2009年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
welfare; inequality; storylines; cost-benefit analysis; declining marginal utility of income; disaggregation; burden sharing; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL ESSAY; DEBATE; POLICY; STERN; IMPACTS; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/015007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is widely accepted that climate change raises equity considerations, and this has been addressed in various explicit and implicit ways in scenario-based climate and climate-policy research. In this paper I look in particular at the IPCC's well-known 'Special Report on Emissions Scenarios', in which equity is primarily quantified as the distribution of income between countries, and highlight the need for more explicit treatment of equity both within and across national borders. I apply an existing method for modeling subnational income distributions and show that this affects the results of welfare calculations of the type used in economic analyses of climate policy. Additionally, I suggest ways in which this kind of equity analysis could be applied to questions that address broader considerations of climate policy and development, such as burden sharing in the allocation of obligations, and conclude with remarks that frame the scenario development process in the context of what I call 'the contested storyline of the present'.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   In fairness to current generations: lost voices in the climate debate [J].
Sagar, AD ;
Banuri, T .
ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (09) :509-514
[32]  
SAGOFF M., 1988, EC EARTH PHILOS LAW
[33]   Global environment and international inequality [J].
Shue, H .
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 1999, 75 (03) :531-+
[34]  
Shukla P. R., 1999, Fair weather?, P145
[35]   The economics of climate change impacts a la Stern: Novel and nuanced or rhetorically restricted? [J].
Spash, Clive L. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (04) :706-713
[36]   Infinite uncertainty, forgotten feedbacks, and cost-benefit analysis of climate policy [J].
Tol, Richard S. J. ;
Yohe, Gary W. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2007, 83 (04) :429-442
[37]   Equitable cost-benefit analysis of climate change policies [J].
Tol, RSJ .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (01) :71-85
[38]   Time discounting and optimal emission reduction:: An application of FUND [J].
Tol, RSJ .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1999, 41 (3-4) :351-362
[39]  
Toth F., 2001, Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[40]  
Toth Ferenc L., 1999, Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change, V1st