In-house trauma surgeons do not decrease mortality in a Level I trauma center

被引:38
作者
Fulda, GJ [1 ]
Tinkoff, GH [1 ]
Giberson, F [1 ]
Rhodes, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Christiana Care Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Wilmington, DE USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2002年 / 53卷 / 03期
关键词
in-house; on-call; outcome; mortality;
D O I
10.1097/00005373-200209000-00017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The value of an in-house trauma surgeon is debated. Previous studies focus on comparing in-house and on-call surgeons at different institutions or different periods in time. The purpose of this study was to simultaneously evaluate in-house and on-call trauma surgeons in a single Level I trauma center and to determine the impact of in-house trauma surgeons on the mortality of severely injured patients. Methods: All records were reviewed for patients classified as major resuscitations from July 1997 through November 1999. Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of mortality on the basis of trauma surgeon status (in-house vs. on-call) and response time, while controlling for Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Revised Trauma Score. Results: Of the 4,278 admissions, 537 were trauma codes. Mean ISS was 20.16 +/- 11.59. There was no difference between groups admitted by in-house surgeons versus on-call surgeons with respect to ISS or Revised Trauma Score. Mortality for the group was 24.8% (133 of 537); no statistical difference existed between observed and expected mortality by TRISS. The average response time was 3.96 minutes for the in-house group and 14.70 minutes for the on-call group (p < 0.001). Neither the call status nor the response time of the trauma surgeon significantly decreased emergency department or hospital mortality. There was a trend for improved outcome in those patients cared for by an in-house surgeon who were upgraded to a code, transferred into the institution, admitted during the night, or neurologically impaired. This trend did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: When the trauma surgeon was rapidly available (< 15 minutes), there was no difference in emergency department or hospital mortality between in-house and on-call trauma surgeons. Selected subgroups of severely injured patients may benefit from an in-house trauma surgeon. If trauma surgeons are not readily available in an institution, an in-house call policy may be necessary for the prompt resuscitation of critically ill patients.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 500
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]  
Maier R V, 1993, J Trauma, V34, P915
[12]   THE IN-HOUSE TRAUMA SURGEON - PARADIGM OR PARADOX [J].
MOORE, EE ;
MOORE, JB ;
MOORE, FA .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1992, 32 (04) :413-414
[13]  
NOER R J, 1963, J Trauma, V3, P331, DOI 10.1097/00005373-196307000-00005
[14]   DIRECT TRANSPORT TO THE OPERATING-ROOM FOR RESUSCITATION OF TRAUMA PATIENTS [J].
RHODES, M ;
BRADER, A ;
LUCKE, J ;
GILLOTT, A .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1989, 29 (07) :907-915
[15]   IN-HOUSE BOARD-CERTIFIED SURGEONS IMPROVE OUTCOME FOR SEVERELY INJURED PATIENTS - A COMPARISON OF 2 UNIVERSITY CENTERS [J].
ROGERS, FB ;
SIMONS, R ;
HOYT, DB ;
SHACKFORD, SR ;
HOLBROOK, T ;
FORTLAGE, D .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1993, 34 (06) :871-877
[16]  
SHACKFORD SR, 1987, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V122, P523
[17]   Trauma service cost - The real story [J].
Taheri, PA ;
Wahl, WL ;
Butz, DA ;
Iteld, LH ;
Michaels, AJ ;
Griffes, LC ;
Bishop, G ;
Greenfield, LJ .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (05) :720-725
[18]   COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL LEVEL-II TRAUMA CENTER OUTCOME [J].
THOMPSON, CT ;
BICKELL, WH ;
SIEMENS, RA ;
SACRA, JC .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1992, 32 (03) :336-343
[19]   Impact of a two-tiered trauma response in the emergency department: Promoting efficient resource utilization [J].
Tinkoff, GH ;
OConnor, RE ;
Fulda, GJ .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 41 (04) :735-740