Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus typing methods:: which should be the international standard?

被引:67
作者
Weller, TMA [1 ]
机构
[1] City Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Microbiol, Birmingham B18 7QH, W Midlands, England
关键词
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA; infection control;
D O I
10.1053/jhin.1999.0701
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has spread to all parts of the world. Effective control measures are dependent on a thorough knowledge of the organism's epidemiology which requires a typing technique that can be universally applied. Many typing methods have been developed for MRSA but none has been adopted as the internationally recognized standard. This review summarizes the information available on each in order to assess their suitability as a reference procedure. The majority of phenotypic and genotypic techniques are not sufficiently discriminatory reproducible, stable or useful in an outbreak to he acceptable. The methods which do fulfil these requirements and have a potential for standardization, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, binary typing or a combination of more rapid techniques, require further systematic evaluation. (C) 2000 The Hospital Infection Society.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 172
页数:13
相关论文
共 93 条
[91]  
WENZEL RP, 1991, AM J MED S3B, V91, P221
[92]  
Witte Wolfgang, 1997, Clin Microbiol Infect, V3, P414, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1997.tb00277.x
[93]   Combined use of ribotyping, PFGE typing and IS431 typing in the discrimination of nosocomial strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Yoshida, T ;
Kondo, N ;
AbuHanifah, Y ;
Hiramatsu, K .
MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 41 (09) :687-695