Algorithms for converting random-zero to automated oscillometric blood pressure values, and vice versa

被引:93
作者
Stang, Andreas
Moebus, Susanne
Moehlenkamp, Stefan
Dragano, Nico
Schmermund, Axel
Beck, Eva-Maria
Siegrist, Johannes
Erbel, Raimund
Joeckel, Karl-Heinz
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Med Epidemiol Biometry & Informat, Fac Med, Halle, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Univ Hosp, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, Essen, Germany
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Univ Hosp, W German Heart Ctr, Essen, Germany
[4] Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Social Med, D-4000 Dusseldorf, Germany
[5] Cardioangiol Ctr, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
blood pressure determination; cohort studies; epidemiologic methods; Germany; hypertension;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwj160
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Many surveys and cohort studies have used a random-zero sphygmomanometer blood pressure device (RZS) to measure subjects' blood pressure and to assess the value of blood pressure in predicting cardiovascular events. Recent studies used automated oscillometric blood pressure devices (AODs) that systematically measure higher blood pressure values than RZSs do, hampering comparability of values between these studies. In 2000-2003, the authors randomly used both an RZS and an AOD in an ongoing cohort study in Germany. This analysis aimed to compare blood pressure values by device and to develop an algorithm to convert estimates of blood pressure values from one device to the other. In a randomized subset of 2,365 subjects aged 45-75 years, each subject was measured three times with each device in a randomized order. The mean difference (AOD-RZS) between the devices was 3.9 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and 2.6 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The authors found that linear regression models including age, sex, and blood pressure level can be used to convert RZS blood pressure values to AOD blood pressure values, and vice versa. Results may help to better compare blood pressure values in epidemiologic studies that used different blood pressure devices.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 9001 ISO
[2]   ABC of hypertension - Blood pressure measurement Part II - Conventional sphygmomanometry: technique of auscultatory blood pressure measurement [J].
Beevers, G ;
Lip, GYH ;
O'Brien, E .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7293) :1043-1047
[3]   Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: Objectives and design [J].
Bild, DE ;
Bluemke, DA ;
Burke, GL ;
Detrano, R ;
Roux, AVD ;
Folsom, AR ;
Greenland, P ;
Jacobs, DR ;
Kronmal, R ;
Liu, K ;
Nelson, JC ;
O'Leary, D ;
Saad, MF ;
Shea, S ;
Szklo, M ;
Tracy, RP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 156 (09) :871-881
[4]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[5]   Mechanisms by which the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimates blood pressure and produces a non-random distribution of RZ values [J].
Brown, WCB ;
Kennedy, S ;
Inglis, GC ;
Murray, LS ;
Lever, AF .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1997, 11 (02) :75-93
[6]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[7]   MEASUREMENT ERROR IN THE HAWKSLEY RANDOM ZERO SPHYGMOMANOMETER - WHAT DAMAGE HAS BEEN DONE AND WHAT CAN WE LEARN [J].
CONROY, RM ;
OBRIEN, E ;
OMALLEY, K ;
ATKINS, N .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6888) :1319-1322
[8]  
EVANS JG, 1970, BRIT J PREV SOC MED, V24, P10
[9]  
Fleiss JL, 2013, STAT METHODS RATES P
[10]  
Franklin SS, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P1245