Exploring HRM Meta-Features that Foster Employees' Innovative Work Behaviour in Times of Increasing Work-Life Conflict

被引:52
作者
Abstein, Adriana [1 ]
Spieth, Patrick [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] EBS Business Sch, Wiesbaden, Germany
[2] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
POSITIVE ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR; HUMAN-RESOURCE PRACTICES; FAMILY CONFLICT; JOB-PERFORMANCE; SELF-EFFICACY; MODEL; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; CAREER; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/caim.12053
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Today, employees' innovative work behaviour (IWB) is critical for companies' success. However, employees increasingly experience work-life conflict (WLC) which negatively influences performance at work. Human resource management (HRM) has the potential to foster employees' engagement in innovative activities and to reduce tensions between work and private life simultaneously. Our paper aims to advance understanding under which conditions these relations occur by exploring HRM meta-features. These are defined as overall characteristics of an HR system helping companies to communicate the content of HR practices in a way that leads to desired interpretations by employees. Using a qualitative, interview study approach, we find that HRM contributes to IWB and diminishes feelings of WLC mainly through the four meta-features individual orientation', discretion orientation', effort orientation' and expectancy orientation'. We link our findings to extant literature and provide suggestions for managers how these meta-features can be put into organizational practice.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 225
页数:15
相关论文
共 100 条
[71]  
Perlow LA, 2009, HARVARD BUS REV, V87, P102
[72]  
Reuvers M., 2008, CREATIVITY INNOVATIO, V17, P227, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8691.2008.00487.X
[73]  
Sanders Karin, 2010, Technology and Investment, V1, P59, DOI 10.4236/ti.2010.11007
[74]   INDIVIDUAL, ORGANIZATION, AND CAREER - CONCEPTUAL SCHEME [J].
SCHEIN, EH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1971, 7 (04) :401-&
[75]  
Schroeder R.G., 1989, Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies, P107
[76]  
SCOTT SG, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P580, DOI 10.5465/256701
[77]  
Seligman M. E. P., 1999, AM PSYCHOL, V54, P229
[78]   What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity [J].
Shalley, CE ;
Gilson, LL .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2004, 15 (01) :33-53
[79]   Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience [J].
Shalley, CE ;
Perry-Smith, JE .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2001, 84 (01) :1-22
[80]   INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GROWTH NEED STRENGTH, WORK CONTEXT, AND JOB COMPLEXITY ON SELF-REPORTED CREATIVE PERFORMANCE [J].
Shalley, Christina E. ;
Gilson, Lucy L. ;
Blum, Terry C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 52 (03) :489-505