Dosing strategies for anticancer drugs: the good, the bad and body-surface area

被引:150
作者
Felici, A [1 ]
Verweij, J [1 ]
Sparreboom, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Daniel Den Hoed, Dept Med Oncol, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
anticancer drugs; body-surface area; pharmacokinetics; dosing strategies;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00151-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Most anticancer drugs are characterised by a narrow therapeutic window, hence, a small change in dose can lead to poor antitumour effects or an unacceptable degree of toxicity. The rationale for using body surface area (BSA) to dose antineoplastic agents is to normalise the effects of drugs, and accordingly, it has been routinely employed as the only independent variable In the last 10 years, however, several studies have shown a poor relationship of BSA for predicting drug exposure, and an irrelevant correlation between this variable and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. In this paper, the results of this relationship for various commonly used antineoplastic agents are reviewed, and the influence of BSA to decrease the total variability in clearance among patients is underlined. As reported, BSA failed to individualise the effects of the majority of the agents explored. The criteria that can predict a clinically meaningful relationship between BSA and drug clearance are discussed, and some alternative strategies to dose agents when BSA has proven to be useless are proposed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1677 / 1684
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Allerheiligen S, 1994, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V13, P339
[2]  
BAKER RJ, 1957, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V104, P183
[3]   Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral fluorouracil on a chronic daily schedule in combination with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inactivator eniluracil [J].
Baker, SD ;
Diasio, RB ;
O'Reilly, S ;
Lucas, VS ;
Khor, SP ;
Sartorius, SE ;
Donehower, RC ;
Grochow, LB ;
Spector, T ;
Hohneker, JA ;
Rowinsky, EK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (04) :915-926
[4]  
Baker SD, 1999, CLIN CANCER RES, V5, P309
[5]   Phase I and II clinical trials of trastuzumab [J].
Baselga, J .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 :49-55
[6]   Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for docetaxel [J].
Bruno, R ;
Vivier, N ;
Veyrat-Follet, C ;
Montay, G ;
Rhodes, GR .
INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2001, 19 (02) :163-169
[7]   A population pharmacokinetic model for docetaxel (Taxotere(R)): Model building and validation [J].
Bruno, R ;
Vivier, N ;
Vergniol, JC ;
DePhillips, SL ;
Montay, G ;
Sheiner, LB .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1996, 24 (02) :153-172
[8]  
BRUNO R, 1997, AM J HLTH SYST PH S2, V15, pS16
[9]   Carboplatin dosing formulae: gender bias and the use of creatinine-based methodologies [J].
Calvert, AH ;
Egorin, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (01) :11-16
[10]   CARBOPLATIN DOSAGE - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF A SIMPLE FORMULA BASED ON RENAL-FUNCTION [J].
CALVERT, AH ;
NEWELL, DR ;
GUMBRELL, LA ;
OREILLY, S ;
BURNELL, M ;
BOXALL, FE ;
SIDDIK, ZH ;
JUDSON, IR ;
GORE, ME ;
WILTSHAW, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (11) :1748-1756