Dosing strategies for anticancer drugs: the good, the bad and body-surface area

被引:150
作者
Felici, A [1 ]
Verweij, J [1 ]
Sparreboom, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Daniel Den Hoed, Dept Med Oncol, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
anticancer drugs; body-surface area; pharmacokinetics; dosing strategies;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00151-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Most anticancer drugs are characterised by a narrow therapeutic window, hence, a small change in dose can lead to poor antitumour effects or an unacceptable degree of toxicity. The rationale for using body surface area (BSA) to dose antineoplastic agents is to normalise the effects of drugs, and accordingly, it has been routinely employed as the only independent variable In the last 10 years, however, several studies have shown a poor relationship of BSA for predicting drug exposure, and an irrelevant correlation between this variable and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. In this paper, the results of this relationship for various commonly used antineoplastic agents are reviewed, and the influence of BSA to decrease the total variability in clearance among patients is underlined. As reported, BSA failed to individualise the effects of the majority of the agents explored. The criteria that can predict a clinically meaningful relationship between BSA and drug clearance are discussed, and some alternative strategies to dose agents when BSA has proven to be useless are proposed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1677 / 1684
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]   HUMAN SURFACE AREA - COMPARISON OF DU BOIS FORMULA WITH DIRECT PHOTOMETRIC MEASUREMENT [J].
MITCHELL, D ;
STRYDOM, NB ;
VANGRAAN, CH ;
VANDERWA.WH .
PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1971, 325 (02) :188-&
[42]   LEAN BODY-MASS AS A PREDICTOR OF DRUG-DOSAGE - IMPLICATIONS FOR DRUG-THERAPY [J].
MORGAN, DJ ;
BRAY, KM .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1994, 26 (04) :292-307
[43]  
Nguyen L, 1998, CANCER CHEMOTH PHARM, V41, P125
[44]  
PINKEL D, 1958, CANCER RES, V18, P853
[45]  
PORT RE, 1991, ONCOLOGY, V48, P277
[46]  
Porter D, 1996, SEMIN ONCOL, V23, P34
[47]   EFFECT OF BODY-WEIGHT ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS [J].
POWIS, G ;
REECE, P ;
AHMANN, DL ;
INGLE, JN .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 20 (03) :219-222
[48]   PHARMACOLOGICALLY BASED DOSING OF ETOPOSIDE - A MEANS OF SAFELY INCREASING DOSE INTENSITY [J].
RATAIN, MJ ;
MICK, R ;
SCHILSKY, RL ;
VOGELZANG, NJ ;
BEREZIN, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (08) :1480-1486
[49]   5-FU THERAPEUTIC MONITORING WITH DOSE ADJUSTMENT LEADS TO AN IMPROVED THERAPEUTIC INDEX IN HEAD AND NECK-CANCER [J].
SANTINI, J ;
MILANO, G ;
THYSS, A ;
RENEE, N ;
VIENS, P ;
AYELA, P ;
SCHNEIDER, M ;
DEMARD, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 59 (02) :287-290
[50]  
Smith HW, 1951, KIDNEY STRUCTURE FUN