Do tibiofemoral contact point and posterior condylar offset influence outcome and range of motion in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty?

被引:28
作者
Geijsen, G. J. P. [1 ]
Heesterbeek, P. J. C. [1 ]
van Stralen, G. [2 ]
Anderson, P. G. [1 ]
Wymenga, A. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartens Clin, NL-6574 NA Ubbergen, Netherlands
[2] Hosp Nij Smellinghe, NL-9202 NN Drachten, Netherlands
关键词
Contact point; Posterior condylar offset; Total knee arthroplasty; Clinical outcome; Range of motion; IN-VIVO DETERMINATION; CRUCIATE-LIGAMENT; FLUOROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; FLEXION; KINEMATICS; REPLACEMENT; ROLLBACK;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-013-2525-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Purpose The posterior condylar offset (PCO) and the tibiofemoral contact point (CP) have been reported as important factors that can influence range of motion and clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty. A mobile-bearing knee implant with an anterior posterior gliding insert would in theory be more sensitive for changes in PCO and CP. For this reason, we analysed the PCO and CP and the relation with outcome and range of motion in 132 patients from a prospectively documented cohort in this type of implant. Methods The prosthesis used was a posterior cruciate retaining AP gliding mobile-bearing total knee replacement (SAL II Sulzer Medica, Switzerland). In 132 knees, the pre- and postoperative PCO and postoperative CP were evaluated. Measurements were made on X-rays of the knee taken in approximately 90 degrees of flexion and with less than 3-mm rotation of the femur condyles. The outcome parameters, range of motion (ROM) and the knee society score (KSS), for each knee were determined preoperatively and at 5-year follow-up. Results The mean KSS improved from 91 to 161 at 5-year follow-up (p < 0.001) and the mean ROM from 102 to 108 (p < 0.05). The mean PCO difference (postoperative PCO-preoperative PCO) was-0.05 mm (SD 2.15). The CP was on average 53.9 % (SD 5.5 %). ROM was different between the 3 PCO groups (p = 0.05): patients with 3 or more mm decrease in PCO had the best postoperative ROM (p = 0.047). There was no statistical difference between the postoperative ROM between patients with a stable PCO and those with an increased PCO. There was no correlation between the difference in PCO and the difference in ROM; R-Pearson = -0.056. There was no difference in postoperative ROM or postoperative total KSS between CP <60 % and CP >60 %: p = 0.22, p = 0.99, for ROM and KSS, respectively. Scatter plots showed uniform clouds of values: increase or decrease in PCO and CP had no significant influence on ROM or KSS. Conclusion The hypotheses that a stable PCO and a more natural CP increase postoperative ROM and improve clinical outcome could not be confirmed. On the contrary, a decreased PCO seemed to improve knee flexion. Furthermore, a relationship between PCO and CP could not be found. Level of evidence Prospective cohort study, Level II.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 555
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties [J].
Banks, S ;
Bellemans, J ;
Nozaki, H ;
Whiteside, LA ;
Harman, M ;
Hodge, WA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (410) :131-138
[2]
Making sense of knee arthroplasty kinematics: News you can use [J].
Banks, SA ;
Harman, MK ;
Bellemans, J ;
Hodge, WA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A :64-72
[3]
Influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacement A prospective analysis of 410 consecutive cases [J].
Bauer, T. ;
Biau, D. ;
Colmar, M. ;
Poux, X. ;
Hardy, P. ;
Lortat-Jacob, A. .
KNEE, 2010, 17 (06) :375-380
[4]
Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty - Influence of posterior condylar offset [J].
Bellemans, J ;
Banks, S ;
Victor, J ;
Vandenneucker, H ;
Moemans, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B :50-53
[5]
The influence of tibial slope on maximal flexion after total knee arthroplasty [J].
Bellemans, J ;
Robijns, F ;
Duerinckx, J ;
Banks, S ;
Vandenneucker, H .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2005, 13 (03) :193-196
[6]
In vivo determination of posterior femoral rollback for subjects having a NexGen posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty [J].
Bertin, KC ;
Komistek, RD ;
Dennis, DA ;
Hoff, WA ;
Anderson, DT ;
Langer, T .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (08) :1040-1048
[7]
A new measurement technique for the tibiofemoral contact point in normal knees and knees with TKR [J].
de Jong, R. J. ;
Heesterbeek, P. J. C. ;
Wymenga, A. B. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2010, 18 (03) :388-393
[8]
Delport HP, 2006, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V88B, P1016, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.88B8
[9]
The Self-Aligning knee prosthesis: clinical and radiological outcome and survival analysis at 5-year follow up [J].
Diks, M. J. F. ;
Anderson, P. G. ;
Janssen, J. C. A. D. ;
van Stralen, G. ;
Wymenga, A. B. .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2008, 16 (02) :128-134
[10]
Partial resection of the PCL insertion site during tibial preparation in cruciate-retaining TKA [J].
Feyen, Hans ;
Van Opstal, Nick ;
Bellemans, Johan .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (12) :2674-2679