MR imaging in the triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain

被引:78
作者
Oto, Aytekin [1 ]
Ernst, Randy D. [2 ]
Ghulmiyyah, Labib M. [3 ]
Nishino, Thomas K. [4 ]
Hughes, Douglas [4 ]
Chaljub, Gregory [4 ]
Saade, George [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch Galveston, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Branch Galveston, Dept Radiol, Galveston, TX USA
来源
ABDOMINAL IMAGING | 2009年 / 34卷 / 02期
关键词
MR; Pregnancy; Appendicitis; Acute abdomen; Abdominal pain; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; IN-UTERO; ACUTE APPENDICITIS; SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS; ADNEXAL TORSION; FOLLOW-UP; SONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; FEATURES; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-008-9381-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
To retrospectively assess the performance of MR imaging in the evaluation and triage of pregnant patients presenting with acute abdominal or pelvic pain. MRI studies of pregnant patients who were referred for acute abdominal pain between 2001 and 2007 were included. MR images were retrospectively reviewed and compared with surgical and pathologic findings and clinical follow-up data. Analysis of imaging findings included evaluation of the visceral organs, bowel and mesentery, appendix (for presence of appendicitis), ovaries (detection and adnexal masses were evaluated), focal inflammation, presence of abscesses, and any other abnormal findings. A total of 118 pregnant patients were included. MR findings were inconclusive in 2 patients and were positive for acute appendicitis in 11 patients (n = 9 confirmed by surgery, n = 2 improved without surgery). One patient with inconclusive MR had surgically confirmed appendicitis; the other patient with inconclusive MR had surgically confirmed adnexal torsion. Other surgical/interventional diagnoses suggested by MR imaging were adnexal torsion (n = 4), abscess (n = 4), acute cholecystitis (n = 1), and gastric volvulus (n = 1). Two patients with MR diagnosis of torsion improved without surgery. One patient with MR diagnosis of abscess had biliary cystadenoma at surgery. The rest of the MR diagnoses above were confirmed surgically or interventionally. MR imaging was normal in 67 patients and demonstrated medically treatable etiology in 28 patients: adnexal lesions (n = 9), urinary pathology (n = 6), cholelithiasis (n = 4), degenerating fibroid (n = 3), DVT (n = 2), hernia (n = 1), colitis (n = 1), thick terminal ileum (n = 1), rectus hematoma (n = 1). Three of these patients had negative surgical exploration and one had adnexal mass excision during pregnancy. Other patients were discharged with medical treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive values (ppv), and negative predictive values (npv) of MR imaging for acute appendicitis, and surgical/ interventional diagnoses were 90.0% vs. 88.9%, 98.1% vs. 95.0%, 97.5% vs. 94.1%, 81.8% vs. 76.2%, 99.1% vs. 97.9%, respectively. MR imaging is an excellent modality for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and exclusion of diseases requiring surgical/interventional treatment. Therefore MR imaging is useful for triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 250
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Resolving appendicitis: role of CT [J].
Kirshenbaum, M ;
Mishra, V ;
Kuo, D ;
Kaplan, G .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 28 (02) :276-279
[12]   Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5 T in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow-up study [J].
Kok, RD ;
de Vries, MM ;
Heerschap, A ;
van den Berg, PP .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 22 (06) :851-854
[13]   DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS IN PREGNANT-WOMEN - VALUE OF SONOGRAPHY [J].
LIM, HK ;
BAE, SH ;
SEO, GS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 159 (03) :539-542
[14]   Cystic focal liver lesions in the adult:: Differential CT and MR imaging features [J].
Mortelé, KJ ;
Ros, PR .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2001, 21 (04) :895-910
[15]   Failure to detect intrauterine growth restriction following in utero exposure to MRI [J].
Myers, C ;
Duncan, KR ;
Gowland, PA ;
Johnson, IR ;
Baker, PN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (845) :549-551
[16]  
NOVAK Z, 1993, INVEST RADIOL, V28, P828
[17]   Revisiting MRI for appendix location during pregnancy [J].
Oto, A ;
Srinivasan, PN ;
Ernst, RD ;
Koroglu, M ;
Cesani, F ;
Nishino, T ;
Chaljub, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (03) :883-887
[18]   Right-lower-quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis in pregnant women: evaluation with MR imaging - Initial experience [J].
Oto, A ;
Ernst, RD ;
Shah, R ;
Koroglu, M ;
Chaljub, G ;
Gei, AF ;
Zacharias, N ;
Saade, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) :445-451
[19]   MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy [J].
Pedrosa, I ;
Levine, D ;
Eyvazzadeh, AD ;
Siewert, B ;
Ngo, L ;
Rofsky, NM .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (03) :891-899
[20]   CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion [J].
Rha, SE ;
Byun, JY ;
Jung, SE ;
Jung, JI ;
Choi, BG ;
Kim, BS ;
Kim, H ;
Lee, JM .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2002, 22 (02) :283-294