Working in a violent environment: The accuracy of police officers' reports about shooting incidents

被引:22
作者
Beehr, TA [1 ]
Ivanitskaya, L [1 ]
Glaser, K [1 ]
Erofeev, D [1 ]
Canali, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Michigan Univ, PhD Program Ind Org Psychol, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1348/096317904774202153
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The occupational stress of chronic working conditions in police organizations has been examined in the past, but the effects of acute stressful events are much more difficult to study systematically. Experienced police officers' memories for elements of a simulated stressful crime scene involving an on-duty shooting incident were examined. Officers were exposed to one of three situations varying in stress. In a 3 x 2 factorial design, some officers reviewed their memories by answering questions immediately after the shooting, while others did not. Twelve weeks later, officers' long-term memories were better for all elements of the crime scene if they had rehearsed. Under some conditions, officers tended to remember the most important elements better (i.e. the number of armed people present) and the least important elements worse (i.e. irrelevant objects). In addition, their confidence in their memories had little or no relationship to their memories' accuracy and there was a threat focus in which objects physically closest to the points of threat were remembered better. There are strong implications for two elements of job performance: writing police reports and testifying in court.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 235
页数:19
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   Unusualness and threat as possible causes of "weapon focus" [J].
Pickel, KL .
MEMORY, 1998, 6 (03) :277-295
[42]  
Poole D.A., 1998, INVESTIGATIVE INTERV
[43]   Memory monitoring in mock jurors [J].
Pritchard, ME ;
Keenan, JM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 1999, 5 (02) :152-168
[44]  
READ JD, 1997, EYEWITNESS MEMORY TH, P107
[45]   A second look at the relationship between rating and behavioral accuracy in performance appraisal [J].
Sanchez, JI ;
DeLaTorre, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (01) :3-10
[46]  
Schooler JW, 1997, NATO ADV SCI I A-LIF, V291, P379
[47]   CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY - A METAANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIES [J].
SPORER, SL ;
PENROD, S ;
READ, D ;
CUTLER, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 118 (03) :315-327
[48]   A METAANALYTIC REVIEW OF THE WEAPON FOCUS EFFECT [J].
STEBLAY, NM .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1992, 16 (04) :413-424
[49]   FACIAL RECOGNITION - WEAPON EFFECT AND ATTENTIONAL FOCUS [J].
TOOLEY, V ;
BRIGHAM, JC ;
MAASS, A ;
BOTHWELL, RK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 17 (10) :845-859
[50]   THE TRACTABILITY OF EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR TRIERS OF FACT [J].
WELLS, GL ;
FERGUSON, TJ ;
LINDSAY, RCL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 66 (06) :688-696