Magnetic resonance low-dose dobutamine test is superior to scar quantification for the prediction of functional recovery

被引:198
作者
Wellnhofer, E [1 ]
Olariu, A [1 ]
Klein, C [1 ]
Gräfe, M [1 ]
Wahl, A [1 ]
Fleck, E [1 ]
Nagel, E [1 ]
机构
[1] German Heart Inst, Berlin, Germany
关键词
hibernation; revascularization; dobutamine; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.0000128862.34201.74
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Low-dose dobutamine challenge (DSMR) by MRI was compared with delayed enhancement imaging with Gd-DTPA ( SCAR) as a predictor of improvement of wall motion after revascularization ( RECOVERY). Methods and Results-In 29 patients with coronary artery disease (68 +/- 7 years of age, 2 women, 32 +/- 8% ejection fraction), wall motion was evaluated semiquantitatively by MRI before and 3 months after revascularization. SCAR and DSMR were performed before revascularization. The transmural extent of scar was assessed semiquantitatively. Binary prediction of RECOVERY was performed by logistic regression in 288 segments with wall motion abnormalities at rest. Receiver operating characteristic-area under curve (AUC) statistics were used to compare different models. Low-dose DSMR (AUC 0.838) was superior to SCAR (AUC 0.728) in predicting RECOVERY. SCAR did not improve accuracy of prediction by DSMR. Subgroup analysis showed superiority of DSMR for 1% to 74% transmural extent of infarction. Conclusions-Low-dose DSMR is superior to SCAR in predicting RECOVERY. This advantage is largest in segments with a delayed enhancement of 1% to 74%.
引用
收藏
页码:2172 / 2174
页数:3
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function [J].
Kim, RJ ;
Fieno, DS ;
Parrish, TB ;
Harris, K ;
Chen, EL ;
Simonetti, O ;
Bundy, J ;
Finn, JP ;
Klocke, FJ ;
Judd, RM .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (19) :1992-2002
[12]   The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. [J].
Kim, RJ ;
Wu, E ;
Rafael, A ;
Chen, EL ;
Parker, MA ;
Simonetti, O ;
Klocke, FJ ;
Bonow, RO ;
Judd, RM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (20) :1445-1453
[13]   Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging - Comparison with positron emission tomography [J].
Klein, C ;
Nekolla, SG ;
Bengel, FM ;
Momose, M ;
Sammer, A ;
Haas, F ;
Schnackenburg, B ;
Delius, W ;
Mudra, H ;
Wolfram, D ;
Schwaiger, M .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (02) :162-167
[14]   Quantitative ischemia detection during cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing by use of FastHARP [J].
Kraitchman, DL ;
Sampath, S ;
Castillo, E ;
Derbyshire, JA ;
Boston, RC ;
Bluemke, DA ;
Gerber, BL ;
Prince, JL ;
Osman, NF .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (15) :2025-2030
[15]   Dependency of contractile reserve on myocardial blood flow - Implications for the assessment of myocardial viability with dobutamine stress echocardiography [J].
Lee, HH ;
DavilaRoman, VG ;
Ludbrook, PA ;
Courtois, M ;
Walsh, JF ;
Delano, DA ;
Rubin, PJ ;
Gropler, RJ .
CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (09) :2884-2891
[16]   Reproducibility of chronic infarct size measurement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Mahrholdt, H ;
Wagner, A ;
Holly, TA ;
Elliott, MD ;
Bonow, RO ;
Kim, RJ ;
Judd, RM .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (18) :2322-2327
[17]   Prediction of regional functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction with low dose dobutamine stress cine MR imaging and contrast enhanced MR imaging [J].
Motoyasu, M ;
Sakuma, H ;
Ichikawa, Y ;
Ishida, N ;
Uemura, S ;
Okinaka, T ;
Isaka, N ;
Takeda, K ;
Nakano, T .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2003, 5 (04) :563-574
[18]  
Pereira RS, 2000, MAGN RESON MATER PHY, V11, P104, DOI 10.1016/S1352-8661(00)00093-4
[19]  
Pereira RS, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V44, P309, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200008)44:2<309::AID-MRM19>3.0.CO
[20]  
2-2