What promotes R&D? Comparative evidence from around the world

被引:113
作者
Brown, James R. [1 ]
Martinsson, Gustav [2 ,3 ]
Petersen, Bruce C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Finance, Coll Business, 3331 Gerdin Business Bldg, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Lindstedtsvagen 30, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Swedish House Finance, Lindstedtsvagen 30, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Washington Univ, Dept Econ, Campus Box 1208,One Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
R & D innovation; R & D tax credits; Financial markets; Intellectual property protection; Technological change; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS; DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDITS; PATENT RIGHTS; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; GROWTH; CONSTRAINTS; INCENTIVES; PROTECTION; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.010
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
R&D drives innovation and productivity growth, but appropriability problems and financing difficulties likely keep R&D investment well below the socially optimal level, particularly in high-technology industries. Though countries around the world are increasingly interested in using tax incentives and other policy initiatives to address this underinvestment problem, there is little empirical evidence comparing the effectiveness of alternative domestic policies and institutions at spurring R&D. Using data from a broad sample of OECD economies, we find that financial market rules that improve accounting standards and strengthen contract enforcement share a significant positive relation with R&D in more innovative industries, as do stronger legal protections for intellectual property. In contrast, stronger creditor rights and more generous R&D tax credits have a negative differential relation with R&D in more innovative industries. These results suggest that domestic policies directly dealing with appropriability and financing problems may be more effective than traditional tax subsides at promoting the innovative investments that drive economic growth. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 462
页数:16
相关论文
共 90 条
[61]   Do financial. constraints hold back innovation and growth? Evidence on the role of public policy [J].
Hyytinen, A ;
Toivanen, O .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (09) :1385-1403
[62]   Technology and Financial Development [J].
Ilyina, Anna ;
Samaniego, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2011, 43 (05) :899-921
[63]   Measuring the social return to R&D [J].
Jones, CI ;
Williams, JC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (04) :1119-1135
[64]   Does intellectual property protection spur technological change? [J].
Kanwar, S ;
Evenson, R .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2003, 55 (02) :235-264
[65]   FINANCE, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND GROWTH - THEORY AND EVIDENCE [J].
KING, RG ;
LEVINE, R .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1993, 32 (03) :513-542
[66]   Law and finance [J].
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-de-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A ;
Vishny, RW .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (06) :1113-1155
[67]   Legal determinants of external finance [J].
LaPorta, R ;
LopezDeSilanes, F ;
Shleifer, A ;
Vishny, RM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (03) :1131-1150
[68]   The Empirical Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Innovation: Puzzles and Clues [J].
Lerner, Josh .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) :343-348
[69]  
LEVIN RC, 1987, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P783
[70]   Law, finance, and economic growth [J].
Levine, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 1999, 8 (1-2) :8-35