Mental depreciation and marginal decision making

被引:50
作者
Heath, C
Fennema, MG
机构
[1] Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637-1511
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.1996.0092
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We propose that individuals practice ''mental depreciation,'' that is, they implicitly spread the fixed costs of their expenses over time or use. Two studies explore how people spread fixed costs on durable goods. A third study shows that depreciation can lead to two distinct errors in marginal decisions: First, people sometimes invest too much effort to get their money's worth from an expense (e.g., they may use a product a lot to spread the fixed expense across more uses). Second, people sometimes invest too little effort to get their money's worth: When people add a portion of the fixed cost to the current costs, their perceived marginal (i.e., incremental) costs exceed their true marginal costs. In response, they may stop investing because their perceived costs surpass the marginal benefits they are receiving. The latter effect is supported by two held studies that explore real board plan decisions by university students. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 108
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MARKETING SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], ACAD MANAGE REV
[3]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SUNK COST [J].
ARKES, HR ;
BLUMER, C .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 35 (01) :124-140
[5]   ESCALATION AND DE-ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT IN RESPONSE TO SUNK COSTS - THE ROLE OF BUDGETING IN MENTAL ACCOUNTING [J].
HEATH, C .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 62 (01) :38-54
[6]  
HEATH C, IN PRESS J CONSUMER
[7]   MENTAL ACCOUNTING AND CATEGORIZATION [J].
HENDERSON, PW ;
PETERSON, RA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1992, 51 (01) :92-117
[8]   MENTAL ACCOUNTING AND OUTCOME CONTIGUITY IN CONSUMER-BORROWING DECISIONS [J].
HIRST, DE ;
JOYCE, EJ ;
SCHADEWALD, MS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 58 (01) :136-152
[9]   ANOMALIES - THE ENDOWMENT EFFECT, LOSS AVERSION, AND STATUS-QUO BIAS [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
KNETSCH, JL ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1991, 5 (01) :193-206
[10]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291