Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern comparisons among intensive care unit and general ward Gram-negative isolates from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection Program (USA)

被引:88
作者
Rhomberg, Paul R. [1 ]
Fritsche, Thomas R.
Sader, Helio S.
Jones, Ronald N.
机构
[1] JMI Labs, N Liberty, IA 52317 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
MYSTIC; carbepenems; ICU; resistance; surveillance; Meropenem;
D O I
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.12.009
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program is a global, longitudinal antimicrobial resistance surveillance network of greater than 100 medical centers worldwide monitoring the susceptibility of bacterial pathogens to carbapenems and other broad-spectrum agents. Between 1999 and 2002, 15 US medical centers referred up to 200 nonduplicate isolates from clinical infections to a central processing laboratory. During this 4-year period, the antimicrobial activity of 11 broad-spectrum agents was assessed against 5389 bacterial isolates using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards)recommended methods with interpretive criteria. Analysis of the MIC results for pathogens isolated from patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) were compared to results from pathogens isolated in non-ICU settings. Among Enterobacteriaceae (3884 strains), the carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem) demonstrated the highest susceptibility rates (>= 98.7%) and with only a 1% increase in resistance for ICU isolates compared to non-ICU organisms. Other antimicrobial agents tested demonstrated consistently higher susceptibility rates against Enterobacteriaceac isolates from ICU (89.7-98.7%) and non-ICU (93.2-99.9%) areas. For the nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli, the rank order of the most active agents having lowest percentage resistance rates were tobramycin (15.5%) < cefepime < imipenem < piperacillin/tazobactam < ceftazidime < meropenem (21.9%) for ICU isolates, and meropenem (7.8%) < cefepime < imipenem < piperacillin/tazobactam < ceftazidime < tobramycin (12.9%) among non-ICU strains. All tested agents showed lower susceptibility rates (range, 1.0-15.3%) and higher resistance rates (range, 0.1-15.1%) for both Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli among the ICU isolates compared to the non-ICU isolates (except for ciprofloxacin against Enterobacteriaceae). Continued surveillance of these broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents in both ICU and general hospital wards appears warranted to monitor the occurrence and spread of antimicrobial resistance in pathogens causing serious infections in these care areas and the possible emergence of resistance mechanisms that could compromise empiric carbapenem therapy. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 62
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Disposition of instilled versus nebulized tobramycin and imipenem in ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients [J].
Badia, JR ;
Soy, D ;
Adrover, M ;
Ferrer, M ;
Sarasa, M ;
Alarcón, A ;
Codina, C ;
Torres, A .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 54 (02) :508-514
[3]   European recommendations for antimicrobial resistance surveillance [J].
Cornaglia, G ;
Hryniewicz, W ;
Jarlier, V ;
Kahlmeter, G ;
Mittermayer, H ;
Stratchounski, L ;
Baquero, F .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2004, 10 (04) :349-383
[4]   Antimicrobial resistance prevalence rates in hospital antibiograms reflect prevalence rates among pathogens associated with hospital-acquired infections [J].
Fridkin, SK ;
Edwards, JR ;
Tenover, FC ;
Gaynes, RP ;
McGowan, JE .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 33 (03) :324-329
[5]   Susceptibility of multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units:: results from the European MYSTIC study group [J].
Goossens, H .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2003, 9 (09) :980-983
[6]   Antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria from Intensive Care Units and Urology Services. A nationwide study in the Netherlands 1995-2000 [J].
Hoogkamp-Korstanje, JAA ;
Roelofs-Willemse, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2003, 21 (06) :547-556
[7]   The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting [J].
Ibrahim, EH ;
Sherman, G ;
Ward, S ;
Fraser, VJ ;
Kollef, MH .
CHEST, 2000, 118 (01) :146-155
[8]   Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from central nervous system specimens as reported by U.S. hospital laboratories from 2000 to 2002 [J].
Jones M.E. ;
Draghi D.C. ;
Karlowsky J.A. ;
Sahm D.F. ;
Bradley J.S. .
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 3 (1)
[9]   Determining the value of antimicrobial surveillance programs [J].
Jones, RN ;
Masterton, R .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2001, 41 (04) :171-175
[10]   Resistance surveillance studies - comparability of results and quality assurance of methods [J].
Kahlmeter, G ;
Brown, DFJ .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 50 (06) :775-777