Prediction of costs, effectiveness, and disease control of a population-based program using home sampling for diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections

被引:29
作者
Andersen, Berit
Gundgaard, Jens
Kretzschmar, Mirjam
Olsen, Jens
Welte, Robert
Oster-Gaard, Lars
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Res Unit Gen Practice, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Infect Dis, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Univ So Denmark, Ctr Appl Hlth Serv Res & Technol Assessment, Odense, Denmark
[4] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Inst Hlth Econ & Hlth Care Management, Neuherberg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.olq.0000200609.77577.3f
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the incremental effects and costs of a home sampling screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis over the current in-office screening practice in Denmark. Goals: To assess the effect of a new screening strategy. Study Design: A dynamic Monte Carlo model estimated prevalence and incidence over 10 years for a home sampling screening program and the current in-office screening. Subsequently, the incremental number of major outcomes averted (MOA) and the related direct and indirect costs were estimated. Results: Infection prevalence after 10 years was 1.0% with a home sampling program and 4.2% with the current in-office screening practice. The total costs per MOA reached $3186 during the first year of the home sampling strategy, but in year 4, the accumulated indirect costs offset the direct costs, and the program henceforth saved society costs. Conclusions: Home sampling should be considered a relevant alternative to the current practice of in-office screening.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 415
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Value of self-reportable screening criteria to identify asymptomatic individuals in the general population for urogential Chlamydia trachomatis infection screening [J].
Andersen, B ;
van Valkengoed, I ;
Olesen, F ;
Moller, JK ;
Ostergaard, L .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 36 (07) :837-844
[2]   Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in general practice: diagnosis, treatment, follow-up and contact tracing [J].
Andersen, B ;
Ostergaard, L ;
Nygard, B ;
Olesen, F .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1998, 15 (03) :223-228
[3]   Population-based strategies for outreach screening of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections:: A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Andersen, B ;
Olesen, F ;
Moller, JK ;
Ostergaard, L .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 185 (02) :252-258
[4]  
*DAN NAT BOARD HLT, 2001, TAKSTS 2002 VEJL 200
[5]   Qualitative analysis of psychosocial impact of diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis: implications for screening [J].
Duncan, B ;
Hart, G ;
Scoular, A ;
Bigrigg, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7280) :195-199
[6]   DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS BY THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION IN YOUNG-PATIENTS WITH ACUTE EPIDIDYMITIS [J].
ELEY, A ;
OXLEY, KM ;
SPENCER, RC ;
KINGHORN, GR ;
BENAHMEIDA, ET ;
POTTER, CW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1992, 11 (07) :620-623
[7]   Sexual behaviour in Britain:: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection [J].
Fenton, KA ;
Korovessis, C ;
Johnson, AM ;
McCadden, A ;
McManus, S ;
Wellings, K ;
Mercer, CH ;
Carder, C ;
Copas, AJ ;
Nanchahal, K ;
Macdowall, W ;
Ridgway, G ;
Field, J ;
Erens, B .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9296) :1851-1854
[8]   An introduction to mathematical models in sexually transmitted disease epidemiology [J].
Garnett, GP .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2002, 78 (01) :7-12
[9]   A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women [J].
Genc, M ;
Mardh, PA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 124 (01) :1-7
[10]  
Gerbase AC, 1998, LANCET, V351, P2, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)90001-0