Using subpopulation invariance to assess test score equity

被引:43
作者
Dorans, NJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Educ Testing Serv, Princeton, NJ 08541 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01158.x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Score equity assessment (SEA) is introduced, and placed within a fair assessment context that includes differential prediction or fair selection and differential item functioning. The notion of subpopulation invariance of linking functions is central to the assessment of score equity, just as it has been for differential item functioning and differential prediction. Advanced Placement (AP) data are used for illustrative purposes. The use of multiple-choice and constructed response items in AP provides an opportunity to observe a case where subpopulation invariance of linking functions does not hold (U.S. History), and a case in which it does hold (Calculus AB). The lack of invariance for U.S. History might be attributed to several sources. The role of SEA in assessing the fairness of test assembly processes is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 68
页数:26
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]  
Tateneni K., 2003, Population invariance of score linking: Theory and applications to Advanced Placement Program examinations, P37
[32]  
TENG S, 1943, ASIATIC STUDIES, V7, P267
[33]  
Thissen D., 1993, DETECTION DIFFERENTI
[34]   CONCEPTS OF CULTURE-FAIRNESS [J].
THORNDIK.RL .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1971, 8 (02) :63-70
[35]  
Thurstone L. L., 1947, Multiple-Factor Analysis: A Development & Expansion of The Vectors of Mind
[36]  
von Davier AA, 2004, J EDUC MEAS, V41, P15
[37]  
Yang W.-L., 2003, Population invariance of score linking: Theory and applications to Advanced Placement Program examinations, P57
[38]   Concordance between ACT and ITED scores from different populations [J].
Yin, P ;
Brennan, RL ;
Kolen, MJ .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 28 (04) :274-289
[39]  
YOUNG JW, 2001, 200106 COLL BOARD