Primary closure of mammalian bites

被引:61
作者
Chen, E [1 ]
Hornig, S [1 ]
Shepherd, SM [1 ]
Hollander, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
lacerations; wounds; mammalian bites; dog; cat; human; infection;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00519.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Suturing of bite wounds remains controversial. The authors evaluated the incidence of wound infection in 145 mammalian bite wounds treated with primary closure. Methods: Consecutive patients with bite wounds receiving primary closure at a university hospital ED had structured closed-question data sheets completed at the time of wound management and suture removal. Infection was determined at the time of suture removal using a previously validated definition. Data included demographics medical history time from injury to evaluation wound characteristics and location details of wound cleansing methods, debridement, foreign body removal, and wound closure methods use of antibiotics and follow-up wound evaluation. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: One hundred forty-five mammalian bite patients were enrolled: 88 dog, 45 cat, and 12 human bites. Patients had a mean (+/-SD) age of 21 +/- 20 years; 58% were male; 86% were white; and they presented a mean (+/-SD) of 1.8 +/- 1.2 hours after injury. Bites occurred on the head and neck (57%), upper extremity (36%), and lower extremity (6%). Wounds had a mean length and width of 2.5 cm and 4.8 mm, respectively. Twelve percent involved structures deep to subcutaneous tissue. After primary wound closure, wound infections occurred in eight patients (5.5%; 95% confidence interval = 1.8% to 9.2%). Conclusions: The data suggest that carefully selected mammalian bite wounds can be sutured with approximately a 6% rate of infection. This infection rate may be acceptable in lacerations where cosmesis is a primary concern.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 161
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   MAMMALIAN BITE WOUNDS [J].
AGHABABIAN, RV ;
CONTE, JE .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1980, 9 (02) :79-83
[2]   PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN COMMON DOG BITE WOUNDS - A CONTROLLED-STUDY [J].
CALLAHAM, M .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1980, 9 (08) :410-414
[3]   CONTROVERSIES IN ANTIBIOTIC CHOICES FOR BITE WOUNDS [J].
CALLAHAM, M .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1988, 17 (12) :1321-1330
[4]   TREATMENT OF COMMON DOG BITES - INFECTION RISK-FACTORS [J].
CALLAHAM, ML .
JACEP-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, 1978, 7 (03) :83-87
[5]   ANTIBIOTICS TO PREVENT INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH DOG-BITE WOUNDS - A METAANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS [J].
CUMMINGS, P .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 23 (03) :535-540
[6]  
Dire D J, 1994, Acad Emerg Med, V1, P258
[7]  
Dire Daniel J., 1992, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, V10, P719
[8]   A COMPARISON OF WOUND IRRIGATION SOLUTIONS USED IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
DIRE, DJ ;
WELSH, AP .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1990, 19 (06) :704-708
[9]   PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS FOR PREVENTING INFECTIONS IN UNCOMPLICATED SOFT-TISSUE WOUNDS REPAIRED IN THE ED [J].
DIRE, DJ ;
COPPOLA, M ;
DWYER, DA ;
LORETTE, JJ ;
KARR, JL .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 2 (01) :4-10
[10]   CAT BITE WOUNDS - RISK-FACTORS FOR INFECTION [J].
DIRE, DJ .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (09) :973-979