Issues in optimization for planning of intensity-modulated radiation therapy

被引:18
作者
Verhey, LJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/srao.2002.32434
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
The clinical use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is expanding rapidly in academic and, more recently, in community-based radiotherapy centers due to a high level of clinician interest, improving reimbursement patterns, and the availability of the tools required to plan and deliver IMRT plans. These tools include inverse planning optimization algorithms and linear accelerator control systems with automated, multifield delivery capabilities. The hazards of this new technology are due primarily to the nonintuitive nature of the inverse planning process and the highly complex methods of delivery required for IMRT dose delivery. Important efforts are being made to define the required quality assurance for these computer-optimized IMRT plans and to find ways to reduce their complexity without reducing the quality of the resulting plans. By minimizing the complexity of these dose plans, one also minimizes the treatment time and the probability of dose delivery errors. Methods of optimization and evaluation of dose plans and practical considerations in inverse planning are discussed. In addition, this article points out the potential hazards of inverse-planned IMRT and discusses methods by which the complexity of these plans might be reduced. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 218
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]
Optimized planning using physical objectives and constraints [J].
Bortfeld, T .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :20-+
[2]
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Butler, EB ;
DiPetrillo, TA ;
Engler, MJ ;
Fraass, B ;
Grant, W ;
Ling, CC ;
Low, DA ;
Mackie, TR ;
Mohan, R ;
Purdy, JA ;
Roach, M ;
Rosenman, JG ;
Verhey, LJ ;
Wong, JW ;
Cumberlin, RL ;
Stone, H ;
Palta, JR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04) :880-914
[3]
Optimized radiation therapy based on radiobiological objectives [J].
Brahme, A .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :35-47
[4]
CAROL MP, 1994, 11 INT C US COMP RAD
[5]
DOSE CALCULATION FOR PHOTON BEAMS WITH INTENSITY MODULATION GENERATED BY DYNAMIC JAW OR MULTILEAF COLLIMATIONS [J].
CHUI, CS ;
LOSASSO, T ;
SPIROU, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (08) :1237-1244
[6]
CHUI CS, 2000, 13 INT C US COMP RAD
[7]
DESIGN OF COMPENSATORS FOR BREAST RADIOTHERAPY USING ELECTRONIC PORTAL IMAGING [J].
EVANS, PM ;
HANSEN, VN ;
MAYLES, WPM ;
SWINDELL, W ;
TORR, M ;
YARNOLD, JR .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (01) :43-54
[8]
The delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy to the breast using multiple static fields [J].
Evans, PM ;
Donovan, EM ;
Partridge, M ;
Childs, PJ ;
Convery, DJ ;
Eagle, S ;
Hansen, VN ;
Suter, BL ;
Yarnold, JR .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2000, 57 (01) :79-89
[9]
Optimization and clinical use of multisegment intensity-modulated radiation therapy for high-dose conformal therapy [J].
Fraass, BA ;
Kessler, ML ;
McShan, DL ;
Marsh, LH ;
Watson, BA ;
Dusseau, WJ ;
Eisbruch, A ;
Sandler, HM ;
Lichter, AS .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :60-+
[10]
Galvin J. M., 2001, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, V51, P76, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01964-2